Brian Keith Laws v. People of the State
| Brian Keith Laws |
| People of the State |
| 2:2019cv05283 |
| June 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| S James Otero |
| Patrick J Walsh |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTIFICATION from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals of case number assigned and briefing schedule. Appeal Docket No. 19-55949 assigned to Petition for Certificate of Appealability, #7 as to Petitioner Brian Keith Laws. (sbou) |
| Filing 7 APPLICATION for Certificate of Appealability to USDC by Petitioner Brian Keith Laws; Filed as Notice of Appeal to 9th CCA from District Court Judgment #4 filed 6/26/2019. Entered 6/27/19. IFP Granted see doc. 5. Certificate of Appealability Pending. (Attachments: #1 Part 2 of Petition, #2 Part 3 of Petition) (car) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/14/2019: #3 Part 4 of Petition) (car). |
| Filing 6 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh: granting #5 REQUEST for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The filing fee is hereby waived. (sbou) |
| Filing 5 DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Petitioner Brian Keith Laws. (et) |
| Filing 4 JUDGMENT by Judge S. James Otero, in favor of People of the State against Brian Keith Laws Related to: Order Dismissing Case #3 . IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (sbou) |
Filing 3
ORDER DISMISSING SECOND AND SUCCESSIVE HABEAS CORPUS PETITION by Judge S. James Otero. (See document for details.) (sbou)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge S. James Otero and referred to Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV-111 and CV-69P) (ghap) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge S. James Otero and referred to Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh.(Filing fee $ 5: FEE DUE.), filed by petitioner Brian Keith Laws. (Attachments: #1 Part 1 2254, #2 Part 2 2254, #3 Part 3 of 2254, #4 Part 4 of 2254) (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Brian Keith Laws v. People of the State | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Brian Keith Laws | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: People of the State | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
