Antonio Fernandez v. M.L.N. East Side Properties, LLC et al
| Antonio Fernandez |
| M.L.N. East Side Properties, LLC, Does 1-10 and JS Trading Enterprise, Inc. |
| 2:2019cv05298 |
| June 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. Dkt. #13 (ake)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Settlement and request to vacate all currently set dates filed by plaintiff Antonio Fernandez. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proof of Service)(Seabock, Amanda) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Amanda Lockhart Seabock on behalf of Plaintiff Antonio Fernandez (Attachments: #1 proof of service)(Attorney Amanda Lockhart Seabock added to party Antonio Fernandez(pty:pla))(Seabock, Amanda) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Antonio Fernandez, upon Defendant M.L.N. East Side Properties, LLC served on 7/8/2019, answer due 7/29/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon ANA M CAMPOS in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to JS Trading Enterprise, Inc. answer now due 8/15/2019, filed by Defendant JS Trading Enterprise, Inc..(Attorney Daniel S H Lee added to party JS Trading Enterprise, Inc.(pty:dft))(Lee, Daniel) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Antonio Fernandez, upon Defendant JS Trading Enterprise, Inc. served on 6/25/2019, answer due 7/16/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process: HEE Y PARK in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Courts Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. (shb)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants JS Trading Enterprise, Inc., M.L.N. East Side Properties, LLC. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Antonio Fernandez. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Antonio Fernandez, (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Antonio Fernandez. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23936338 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Antonio Fernandez. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Antonio Fernandez(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
