Leonel Loyo v. KeHE Distributors, LLC et al
Leonel Loyo |
Does 1 through 20, inclusive, KeHE Distributors, LLC, David Bain and KeHE Distributors, Inc. |
2:2019cv05403 |
June 20, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Eastern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Jesus G. Bernal for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Shashi H. Kewalramani. New Case Number 5:19-cv-1142 JGB (SHKx). (ghap) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants KEHE DISTRIBUTORS, INC., KEHE DISTRIBUTORS, LLC. (Demerjian, James) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants All Defendants, (Attorney James H Demerjian added to party KEHE DISTRIBUTORS, INC.(pty:dft))(Demerjian, James) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino Superior Court, case number CIVDS1911511 Receipt No: 0973-23956787 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant KEHE DISTRIBUTORS, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration) (Attorney James H Demerjian added to party KEHE DISTRIBUTORS, LLC(pty:dft))(Demerjian, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.