Lorrie Rough v. Andrew M. Saul
| Lorrie Rough |
| Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew M. Saul |
| 2:2019cv05406 |
| June 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L Abrams |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff Lorrie Rough. correcting Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 (Ruzin, Irene) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams for all further proceedings. Please use the case number CV19-5406 PLA on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn) |
| Filing 14 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Saul Andrews. (Attorney Jean M Turk added to party Saul Andrews (pty:dft))(Turk, Jean) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Lorrie Rough, upon Defendant Saul Andrews served on 7/1/2019, answer due 10/29/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Ruzin, Irene) |
| Filing 12 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by plaintiff Lorrie Rough. (Ruzin, Irene) |
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (ch)
|
| Filing 10 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to defendant Saul Andrews. (ch) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams.IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is hereby GRANTED. #8 (ch)
|
| Filing 8 REQUEST to Amended Request for Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Lorrie Rough. (Ruzin, Irene) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson: denying #4 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff SHALL PAY THE FILING FEES IN FULL, or submit a revised Request to Proceed IFP, within 30 days or this case will be dismissed. (mrgo)
|
| RECOMMENDATION issued by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. Re REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support #4 . Proposed Order forwarded to the District Judge for approval.(ch) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and referred to Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Lorrie Rough, (Ruzin, Irene) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Lorrie Rough. (Ruzin, Irene) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Lorrie Rough. (Ruzin, Irene) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Lorrie Rough. (Ruzin, Irene) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Lorrie Rough. (Attorney Irene Ruzin added to party Lorrie Rough (pty:pla))(Ruzin, Irene) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
