Lori Driscoll v. Andrew Saul
| Lori Driscoll |
| Andrew Saul |
| 2:2019cv05432 |
| June 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Andrew Saul. (Attorney Annabelle J Yang added to party Andrew Saul(pty:dft))(Yang, Annabelle) |
| Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Lori Driscoll, upon Defendant Andrew Saul served on 7/3/2019, answer due 10/31/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Attorney General. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Deborah L. Stachel, Regional Chief Counsel, Office of the Regional Chief Counsel-Region IX. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Koenig, Andrew) |
Filing 7
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER [Social Security] by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. Plaintiff shall electronically file a proof of service showing compliance with this paragraph within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. (See document for details.) (sbou)
|
| Filing 6 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Andrew Saul. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and referred to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Lori Driscoll, identifying David Holzman. (Koenig, Andrew) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Lori Driscoll. (Koenig, Andrew) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Lori Driscoll. (Koenig, Andrew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23962533 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Lori Driscoll. (Attorney Andrew Thomas Koenig added to party Lori Driscoll(pty:pla))(Koenig, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lori Driscoll v. Andrew Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
| Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-CV |
| Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA |
| Represented By: | Annabelle J Yang |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lori Driscoll | |
| Represented By: | Andrew Thomas Koenig |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
