Steven Gianelli et al v. Starbucks Corporation, et al
Steven Gianelli and Miles Jones |
Starbucks Corporation d/b/a Starbucks, Roberto Carlos Sierra, Starbucks Corporation, Does 1 to 10 and Starbucks Corporation a Washington corporation doing business as Starbucks |
2:2019cv05438 |
June 21, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dolly M Gee |
Alka Sagar |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 Joint STIPULATION to Stay Case pending Arbitration filed by Defendant Starbucks Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Woods, Tiffany) |
Filing 19 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee. The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Status Report #18 . In that Report, the parties indicate that they have agreed to submit this matter to binding arbitration. In light of the parties' agreement, they shall meet and confer and file a stipulation and proposed order by no later than August 16, 2019 as to whether this action shall be stayed pending arbitration or dismissed without prejudice. The August 2, 2019 Scheduling Conference is VACATED. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kti) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 18 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 4-5 days, filed by Defendant Starbucks Corporation.. (Woods, Tiffany) |
Filing 17 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE filed by Plaintiffs Steven Gianelli, Miles Jones (Richie, Darren) |
Filing 16 DECLARATION of Tiffany Woods re: (1) Filing of Notice of Removal and Notice to Clerk in Los Angeles County Superior Court and Service of Notice of Removal on Plaintiffs; and (2) Filing of Proof of Service filed by Defendant Starbucks Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Declaration C)(Woods, Tiffany) |
Filing 15 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Darren Michael Richie counsel for Plaintiffs Steven Gianelli, Miles Jones. Delaney Miller is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Steven Giannelli and Miles Jones. (Richie, Darren) |
Filing 14 Second NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Darren Michael Richie on behalf of Plaintiffs Steven Gianelli, Miles Jones (Richie, Darren) |
Filing 13 First NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Darren Michael Richie on behalf of Plaintiffs Steven Gianelli, Miles Jones (Richie, Darren) |
Filing 12 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, 26(f)] by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 7/19/2019. Scheduling Conference set for 8/2/2019 at 9:30 a.m. (See order for details.) (kti) |
Filing 11 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti) |
Filing 10 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (esa) |
Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Starbucks Corporation, re Declaration #7 re: Declaration of Sarah Rogers served on June 21, 2019. (Woods, Tiffany) |
CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by defendant Starbucks Corporation. (Filed in state court 5/17/19, submitted as document 1, attachment 2)(esa) |
COPY OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL IN STATE COURT filed by plaintiffs Steven Gianelli, Miles Jones as to Roberto Carlos Sierra. (submitted as document 1, attachment 3) (esa) |
CONFORMED COPY OFPROOF OF SERVICE executed by Plaintiffs Steven Gianelli, Miles Jones, upon Defendant Starbucks Corporation served on 4/4/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CSC, Agent of Service of Process, in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity. Original Summons NOT returned. (Filed in state court 4/17/19, submitted as document 1, attachment 4) (esa) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does, Roberto Carlos Sierra, Starbucks Corporation, Jury Demand, filed by plaintiffs Steven Gianelli, Miles Jones. (Filed in state court 3/27/19, submitted as document 1, attachment 1) (esa) |
Filing 7 DECLARATION of Sarah Rogers re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Starbucks Corporation d/b/a Starbucks. (De Leon, Lara) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Starbucks Corporation d/b/a Starbucks. (De Leon, Lara) |
Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Starbucks Corporation d/b/a Starbucks (De Leon, Lara) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Starbucks Corporation d/b/a Starbucks, identifying Plaintiff Steven Giannelli; Plaintiff Miles Jones; Defendant Starbucks Corporation. (De Leon, Lara) |
Filing 3 DECLARATION of Lara C. De Leon re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Starbucks Corporation d/b/a Starbucks. (De Leon, Lara) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Starbucks Corporation d/b/a Starbucks. (De Leon, Lara) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California-Van Nuys, case number 19VECV00424 Receipt No: 0973-23963655 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Starbucks Corporation d/b/a Starbucks. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Defendant's Answer, #3 Exhibit C - Request for Dismissal, #4 Exhibit D) (Attorney Lara Cardin De Leon added to party Starbucks Corporation d/b/a Starbucks(pty:dft))(De Leon, Lara) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.