Zinus Inc. v. Classic Brands, LLC
| Zinus Inc. |
| Classic Brands, LLC |
| 2:2019cv05455 |
| June 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F Eick |
| Philip S Gutierrez |
| Stephen V Wilson |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to infringement of certain beds filed by plaintiff Zinus Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 10/21/2019 at 01:30 PM before Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum P&A, #2 Proposed Order SUF, #3 Proposed Order, #4 Declaration Lawrie, #5 Declaration Green, #6 Declaration Ketchum, #7 Declaration Solorzano, #8 Declaration Palmer, #9 Exhibit Exh 1 to Palmer, #10 Exhibit Exh 2 to Palmer, #11 Exhibit Exh 3 to Palmer, #12 Exhibit Exh 4 to Palmer, #13 Exhibit Exh 5 to Palmer, #14 Exhibit Exh 6 to Palmer) (Wallace, Darien) |
| Filing 23 Amended NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Transfer Case to U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland filed by Defendant Classic Brands, LLC. Motion set for hearing on 10/7/2019 at 01:30 PM before Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (Cook, Noel) |
| Filing 22 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Transfer Case to U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland filed by Defendant Classic Brands, LLC. Motion set for hearing on 10/7/2019 at 01:30 PM before Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration of Noel Cook, #3 Declaration of Michael Zippelli, #4 Proposed Order) (Cook, Noel) |
Filing 21
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Scheduling Conference set for 10/28/2019 at 02:00 PM. (wm)
|
| Filing 20 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Classic Brands, LLC, identifying Classic Brands, LLC; Classic Brands Holdings, LLC; A&M Classic Holdco, LLC; A&M Capital Opportunities, LLC; Michael Zippelli; Xiong Yu; Daniel Dietz; and John Zippelli. (McFarlane, Robert) |
| Filing 19 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 with JURY DEMAND, COUNTERCLAIM against Zinus Inc. filed by Defendant Classic Brands, LLC.(McFarlane, Robert) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY NOT MORE THAN 30 DAYS by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. The response of Defendant Classic Brands, LLC, to the complaint filed by Plaintiff in this action shall be due on 8/16/2019. (yl)
|
| Filing 17 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Classic Brands, LLC, re Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply #16 served on 07/17/2019. (Cook, Noel) |
| Filing 16 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File to initial Complaint by not more than 30 days filed by Defendant Classic Brands, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Cook, Noel) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Rosanna W Gan on behalf of Defendant Classic Brands, LLC (Attorney Rosanna W Gan added to party Classic Brands, LLC(pty:dft))(Gan, Rosanna) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Robert A McFarlane on behalf of Defendant Classic Brands, LLC (Attorney Robert A McFarlane added to party Classic Brands, LLC(pty:dft))(McFarlane, Robert) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Noel M Cook on behalf of Defendant Classic Brands, LLC (Attorney Noel M Cook added to party Classic Brands, LLC(pty:dft))(Cook, Noel) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Zinus Inc., upon Defendant Classic Brands, LLC served on 6/26/2019, answer due 7/17/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Kevin Lewinsky, Manager in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Wallace, Darien) |
|
Filing 11
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ji)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER TO TRANSFER CASE TO THE PATENT PILOT PROGRAM by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. Case transferred from Judge Stephen V. Wilson to Judge Philip S. Gutierrez for all further proceedings. Case number now reads 2:19-cv-05455 PSG(Ex). (rn)
|
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Classic Brands, LLC. (car) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (car) |
| Filing 6 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Zinus Inc.. (Wallace, Darien) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiff Zinus Inc.. (Wallace, Darien) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Zinus Inc. identifying Zinus Inc. (Korea) as Corporate Parent. (Wallace, Darien) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Zinus Inc., identifying Zinus Inc. (Korea). (Wallace, Darien) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Zinus Inc.. (Wallace, Darien) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23967376 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Zinus Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Wallace, #2 Exhibit A-D to decl Wallace, #3 Declaration Green) (Attorney Darien Kenneth Wallace added to party Zinus Inc.(pty:pla))(Wallace, Darien) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
