Brian Whitaker v. Essex PE Lofts, L.P. et al
Brian Whitaker |
Does 1-10, Essex PE Lofts, L.P., Wesco GP, LLC and Spirited Ventures 11, Inc. |
2:2019cv05461 |
June 24, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Cormac J Carney |
Alicia G Rosenberg |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint #19 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every parties first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. (iv) |
Filing 21 NOTICE of Change of address by Russell C Handy attorney for Plaintiff Brian Whitaker. Changing attorneys address to 8033 Linda Vista Road, Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92111. Filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 20 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Spirited Ventures 11, Inc. answer now due 9/20/2019, filed by Defendant Spirited Ventures 11, Inc..(Attorney Nathan Vern Okelberry added to party Spirited Ventures 11, Inc.(pty:dft))(Okelberry, Nathan) |
Filing 19 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Wesco GP, LLC.(Attorney Aryan Vahedy added to party Wesco GP, LLC(pty:dft))(Vahedy, Aryan) |
Filing 18 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, upon Defendant Spirited Ventures 11, Inc. served on 8/8/2019, answer due 8/29/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Spencer Doe- Analyst in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 17 ORDER RE: LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED ANSWER TO ASSERT A CROSS-CLAIM #16 by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Defendant ESSEX PE LOFTS, L.P. shall have 20 days to file the Amended Answer. (iv) |
Filing 16 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Amend filed by Defendant Essex PE Lofts, L.P.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Muench, Richard) |
Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker, re Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #13 served on 08/01/2019. (Carson, Chris) |
Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, upon Defendant Wesco GP, LLC served on 7/3/2019, answer due 7/24/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent lor Service olProcess: DANIEL J. ROSENIIIIRG (Vanessa Soriano-Legal Assitant) in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 13 NOTICE OF INTENT upon filing of the complaint by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Scheduling order to be issued on September 19, 2019. (gga) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendent Essex PE Lofts, L.P., identifying Wesco GP LLC; Spirited Ventures 11, Inc.; Cole's French Dip Restaurant. (Vahedy, Aryan) |
Filing 11 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Notice of Interested Parties to be filed no later than July 29, 2019. (gga) |
Filing 10 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint #9 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. (iv) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Essex PE Lofts Essex PE Lofts, L.P..(Attorney Richard A Muench, Jr added to party Essex PE Lofts, L.P.(pty:dft))(Muench, Richard) |
Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, upon Defendant Essex PE Lofts, L.P. served on 7/3/2019, answer due 7/24/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent - Jordan Ritter in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Essex PE Lofts, L.P., Spirited Ventures 11, Inc., Wesco GP, LLC. (lh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (lh) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23967834 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Brian Whitaker(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.