Jose Medina v. Curtis D. Randolph et al
Plaintiff: Jose Medina
Defendant: Curtis D. Randolph and Does 1 to 10, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2019cv05484
Filed: June 24, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Andre Birotte
Referring Judge: Steve Kim
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1444
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 5, 2019 Filing 9 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles Superior Court, County of Los Angeles. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles Superior Court, County of Los Angeles. (yl)
July 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. The Court sua sponte REMANDS this action to the California Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as set forth below. (See Orde for further details) remanding case to Los Angeles Superior Court, Case number 19AVUDOO627 Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (yl)
July 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAURPERIS by Judge Andre Birotte Jr\ denying #2 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). This case is hereby REMANDED to state court. (yl)
June 28, 2019 RECOMMENDATION issued by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim re Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support #2 . Proposed Order forwarded to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr. for review. (cw)
June 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
June 24, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
June 24, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (ghap)
June 24, 2019 Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Curtis D. Randolph. (ghap)
June 24, 2019 Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by defendant Curtis D. Randolph. (ghap)
June 24, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, case number 19AVUD00627 with CONFORMED FILED copy of summons and complaint. Case assigned to Judge Andre Birotte Jr, Discovery to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim., filed by defendant Curtis D. Randolph. (Attachments: #1 CV-71) (ghap)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jose Medina v. Curtis D. Randolph et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Curtis D. Randolph
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 to 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jose Medina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?