Nancy Sayle v. Allied Interstate, LLC
Plaintiff: Nancy Sayle
Defendant: Allied Interstate, LLC and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2019cv05490
Filed: June 24, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Paul L Abrams
Referring Judge: Otis D Wright
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 14, 2019 Filing 13 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [FRCP 16, 26(f)]; SCHEDULING CONFERENCE [FRCP 26(f)] by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Scheduling Conference set for November 4, 2019 at 1:30 p.m. (lom)
August 13, 2019 Filing 12 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Allied Interstate, LLC identifying iQor US, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Frampton, Zachary)
August 13, 2019 Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 * Defendant Allied Interstate, LLCs Answer And Affirmative Defenses To Complaint * filed by Defendant Allied Interstate, LLC.(Frampton, Zachary)
July 23, 2019 Filing 10 Second STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Allied Interstate, LLC answer now due 8/13/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Allied Interstate, LLC.(Derderian, Patil)
July 22, 2019 Filing 9 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Zachary C Frampton counsel for Defendant Allied Interstate, LLC. Adding Zachary C. Frampton as counsel of record for Defendant Allied Interstate, LLC for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Allied Interstate, LLC. (Attorney Zachary C Frampton added to party Allied Interstate, LLC(pty:dft))(Frampton, Zachary)
July 19, 2019 Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Nancy Sayle, upon Defendant Allied Interstate, LLC served on 6/25/2019, answer due 7/30/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Carlos Paz, representative in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Golden, Jeremy)
July 15, 2019 Filing 7 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Allied Interstate, LLC answer now due 7/30/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Allied Interstate, LLC.(Attorney Patil Derderian added to party Allied Interstate, LLC(pty:dft))(Derderian, Patil)
June 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFIC FILING REQUIREMENTS AND INFORMATION; PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. all proposed sealed documents must be submitted via e-mail to the Judges Chambers email address, EXCLUDING those submitted by pro se parties and IN CAMERA filings, which shall continue to comply with Local Rule 79-5.1. Please refer to the Judges procedures and schedules for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents. (lc)
June 25, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments No. 1 Civil Cover Sheet, No. 2 Certification as to Interested Parties, and No. 3 Summons should not have been attached to Docket Entry No. 1. Each document should have been filed separately. You are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs. (lh)
June 25, 2019 Filing 4 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Allied Interstate, LLC. (lh)
June 25, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
June 25, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (lh)
June 24, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23972659 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Nancy Sayle. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties, #3 Summons) (Attorney Jeremy S Golden added to party Nancy Sayle(pty:pla))(Golden, Jeremy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nancy Sayle v. Allied Interstate, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nancy Sayle
Represented By: Jeremy S Golden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Allied Interstate, LLC
Represented By: Patil Derderian
Represented By: Abraham J Colman
Represented By: Zachary C Frampton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?