Jesus Ibarra v. Asset Acceptance, LLC
| Jesus Ibarra |
| Asset Acceptance, LLC |
| Pacific Escrow, Inc. |
| 2:2019cv05531 |
| June 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alexander F MacKinnon |
| Christina A Snyder |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 21 DAY Summons Issued re Third Party Complaint #11 as to third party defendant Pacific Escrow, Inc. (lc) |
| Filing 15 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Third Party Complaint #11 filed by Third Party Complainant Asset Acceptance, LLC. (Landers, Thomas) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE ATTACHMENT ONLY TO THE Third Party Complaint[11-1]. The following error(s) was found: Incorrect filing procedures, summons was submitted as an attachment to the Third Party Complaint. Filer must formally file under correct event ONLY: SUMMONS REQUEST.Note: to narrow the selection process Note: To assist in a search for correct events, please use the "SEARCH" option for a "key word":. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (lc) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by defendant Asset Acceptance, LLC, identifying Encore Capital Group, Inc.. (Landers, Thomas) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by defendant Asset Acceptance, LLC.(Landers, Thomas) |
| Filing 11 THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT against Third-party defendant Pacific Escrow, Inc. ; Jury Demand, filed by defendant, third-party plaintiff Asset Acceptance, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Landers, Thomas) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE TO COUNSEL upon filing of the complaint by Judge Christina A. Snyder. (rba) |
| Filing 9 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to All Parties, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Asset Acceptance, LLC.(Attorney Thomas F Landers, Jr added to party Asset Acceptance, LLC(pty:dft))(Landers, Thomas) |
| Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jesus Ibarra, upon Defendant Asset Acceptance, LLC served on 6/27/2019, answer due 7/18/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Defendant in compliance with statute not specified by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Brazier, Brian) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Asset Acceptance, LLC. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Jesus Ibarra. (Brazier, Brian) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jesus Ibarra, identifying Jesus Ibarra. (Brazier, Brian) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Jesus Ibarra. (Brazier, Brian) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23980583 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Jesus Ibarra. (Attorney Brian James Brazier added to party Jesus Ibarra(pty:pla))(Brazier, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
