Jae Jeong Lyu v. Robert Hight et al
Plaintiff: Lyu Jae Jeong and Jae Jeong Lyu
Defendant: John P. Yutan, Timothy Shumaker, Stacie Gravely, Robert Hight, Sammy Cruz and Stephen Isago
Case Number: 2:2019cv05533
Filed: June 25, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Frederick F Mumm
Referring Judge: James V Selna
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 23, 2019 Proposed IFP Order forwarded to the District Judge for approval.(jm)
August 16, 2019 Filing 15 Notice of Deficiency. On 8/14/2019, the Court received, through the United States Mail, the attached document for filing in the above-captioned case, which alleges claims arising under 42 U.S.C. 1983. Please be advised that the Court and California Rehabilitation Center (CRC) are participants in a pilot project that requires all such documents to be scanned and submitted to the Court by electronic mail, General Order No. 18-02. To submit a document for filing in this case, you must present it to designated staff at your facility for scanning and emailing to the Court. If you are unable to comply with these procedures, you must submit with your document(s) a motion for leave to file your documents by U.S. Mail that demonstrates good cause for your inability to submit your documents to the Court electronically. Submission of this document by U.S. Mail violates the terms of General Order 18-02, it is hereby ORDERED that the document(s) be rejected. You must now re-submit your document(s) to the Court electronically, in accordance to General Order 18-02 and your institution's policies. If you fail to do so, the document(s) will not be filed and will not be considered by the court. (jm)
August 14, 2019 Filing 14 AFFIDAVIT in Poverty (Forma Pauperis) filed by Plaintiff Jae Jeong Lyu.(hr)
August 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES by Judge James V. Selna. IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees #1 is DENIED, with leave to amend within 30 days. (yl)
August 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES by Judge James V. Selna. IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees is: DENIED, with leave to amend within 30 days. Plaintiff may re-submit the IFP application and Complaint to this Court, if submitted with the Certified Trust Account Statement and Disbursement Authorization. Plaintiff shall utilize the same case number. If plaintiff fails to submit the required documents within 30 days, this case shall be DISMISSED. (see document for further details) (hr)
August 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm, ORDERING Civil Rights Complaint submitted by Plaintiff Jae Jeong Lyu, received on 08/06/2019, is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: Duplicate copy of #7 -Civil Rights Complaint. (hr)
August 8, 2019 Proposed fee waiver forwarded to the District Judge for approval.(jm)
July 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order Denying Plaintiff's Motion Regarding Previously Submitted in Forma Pauperis Application #8 by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. The Court has received plaintiff's 7/26/19 motion requesting that the Court accept and consider the in forma pauperis application plaintiff previously submitted to the Court by mail. The in forma pauperis application in question was struck from the record on the ground that General Order 18-02 requires that the document be scanned and emailed from plaintiff's prison. The Court therefore DENIES plaintiff's motion. Plaintiff must file the application and supporting documents in compliance with General Order 18-02. (sp)
July 26, 2019 Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Jae Jeong Lyu, served on 7/26/2019. (ghap)
July 26, 2019 Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to File filed by plaintiff Jae Jeong Lyu. (ghap)
July 26, 2019 Filing 7 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Sammy Cruz(individual), Sammy Cruz(L.A.P.D.- Wilshire Area, Vice Unit, official capacity), Stacie Gravely(individual), Stacie Gravely(Deputy District Attorney, official capacity), Robert Hight(Deputy of District Attorney, official capacity), Robert Hight(individual), Stephen Isago, Timothy Shumaker(L.A.P.D. Detective Wilshire Area Vice Unit), Timothy Shumaker(individual), John P. Yutan(Deputy of Public Defendant, official capacity), John P. Yutan(inidividual) pursuant to 42:1983. Case assigned to Judge James V. Selna and referred to Magistrate Judge Frederick F Mumm., filed by plaintiff Jae Jeong Lyu. (ghap)
July 23, 2019 Filing 6 Notice of Deficiency. On 7/18/2019, the Court received, through the United States Mail, a complaint arising under 42 U.S.C. 1983. Please be advised that the Court and California Rehabilitation Center (CRC) are participants in a pilot project that requires all such documents to be scanned and submitted to the Court by electronic mail, General Order No. 18-02. Submission of this complaint by U.S. Mail violates the terms of General Order 18-02. To submit a complaint arising under 42 U.S.C. 1983 to the Court for filing, you must present it to designated CRC staff for scanning and emailing to the Court. If you are unable to comply with these procedures, you must submit with your complaint a motion for leave to file your documents by U.S. Mail that demonstrates good cause for your inability to submit your documents to the Court electronically. You must now re-submit your complaint to the Court electronically. You must submit for scanning an exact copy of the complaint you previously mailed to the Court; it cannot be modified in any way. You must include this notice on top of the complaint submitted for scanning. If your complaint is received in the Court's electronic mail box within two weeks from the date of this letter, your complaint will be deemed filed as of the date that appears on the envelope you originally sent via U.S. Mail. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (klg)
July 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER STRIKING FILED DOCUMENTS FROM THE RECORD by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm: the documents listed below were improperly filed for the following reasons: Documents received in violation of General Order 18-02 - Must be scanned and emailed from the prison; therefore, the following document(s) shall be stricken from the record and shall not be considered by the Court: REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support #1 , Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights) #3 . The case shall remain open for 2 weeks to allow plaintiff to file his complaint under the same case number but in compliance with General Order 18-02. (jm)
June 25, 2019 Filing 4 Notice of Deficiency. On 6/18/2019, the Court received, through the United States Mail, a complaint arising under 42 U.S.C. 1983. Please be advised that the Court and California Rehabilitation Center (CRC) are participants in a pilot project that requires all such documents to be scanned and submitted to the Court by electronic mail, General Order No. 18-02. Submission of this complaint by U.S. Mail violates the terms of General Order 18-02. To submit a complaint arising under 42 U.S.C. 1983 to the Court for filing, you must present it to designated CRC staff for scanning and emailing to the Court. If you are unable to comply with these procedures, you must submit with your complaint a motion for leave to file your documents by U.S. Mail that demonstrates good cause for your inability to submit your documents to the Court electronically. You must now re-submit your complaint to the Court electronically. You must submit for scanning an exact copy of the complaint you previously mailed to the Court; it cannot be modified in any way. You must include this notice on top of the complaint submitted for scanning. If your complaint is received in the Court's electronic mail box within two weeks from the date of this letter, your complaint will be deemed filed as of the date that appears on the envelope you originally sent via U.S. Mail. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (ghap)
June 25, 2019 Filing 3 *STRICKEN - Per Order to Strike #5 - CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Sammy Cruz(individual), Sammy Cruz(L.A.P.D.- Wilshire Area, Vice Unit, official capacity), Stacie Gravely(individual), Stacie Gravely(Deputy District Attorney, official capacity), Robert Hight(Deputy of District Attorney, official capacity), Robert Hight(individual), Stephen Isago, Timothy Shumaker(L.A.P.D. Detective Wilshire Area Vice Unit), Timothy Shumaker(individual), John P. Yutan(Deputy of Public Defendant, official capacity), John P. Yutan(individual) pursuant to 42:1983. Case assigned to Judge James V. Selna and referred to Magistrate Judge Frederick F Mumm., filed by plaintiff Lyu Jae Jeong. (Attachments: #1 Part 1 of Civil Rights Complaint, #2 Part 2 of Civil Rights Complaint, #3 Part 3 of Civil Rights Complaint) (ghap) Modified on 7/12/2019 (jm).
June 25, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and referred to Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (ghap)
June 25, 2019 Filing 1 *STRICKEN - Per Order to Strike #5 - REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Lyu Jae Jeong. (ghap) Modified on 7/12/2019 (jm).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jae Jeong Lyu v. Robert Hight et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John P. Yutan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Timothy Shumaker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stacie Gravely
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Hight
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sammy Cruz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stephen Isago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lyu Jae Jeong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jae Jeong Lyu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?