Michael R. Spengler v. Deputy Rambo et al
Michael R. Spengler |
Deputy Song, Deputy Rambo, R.N. Luna, Deputy Hale, Deputy Trinh and Deputy Martinez |
2:2019cv05577 |
June 26, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
David O Carter |
Sheri Pym |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 SUPPLEMENT to Complaint filed by Plaintiff Michael R. Spengler. (sbou) |
Filing 4 ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: denying #2 REQUEST for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee. Plaintiff SHALL PAY THE FILING FEES IN FULL within 30 days or this case will be dismissed. (sbou) |
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION issued by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. Re REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support #2 . Proposed Order forwarded to the District Judge for approval.(iva) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (esa) |
Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Michael R. Spengler. (esa) |
Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against defendants Hale, Luna, Martinez, Rambo, Song, Trinh pursuant to 42:1983. Case assigned to Judge David O. Carter and referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym, filed by plaintiff Michael R. Spengler. (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.