Aziz Fattahi v. Aldi Inc. et al
Plaintiff: AZIZ FATTAHI
Defendant: Aldi Inc. and DOES 1-10, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2019cv05684
Filed: June 28, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Percy Anderson
Referring Judge: Alicia G Rosenberg
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 26, 2019 Filing 12 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Aldi Inc. answer now due 9/25/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Aldi Inc..(Attorney Destiny Jarine Brown added to party Aldi Inc.(pty:dft))(Brown, Destiny)
July 25, 2019 Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to defendant Aldi Inc. (mrgo)
July 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (lom)
July 2, 2019 Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons, #8 filed by Plaintiff Aziz Fattahi. (Fattahi, Kamran)
July 2, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #3 . The following error(s) was found: Please put for the Central District of California. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (ghap)
July 2, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
July 2, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (ghap)
June 28, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff AZIZ FATTAHI, (Fattahi, Kamran)
June 28, 2019 Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by AZIZ FATTAHI. (Fattahi, Kamran)
June 28, 2019 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff AZIZ FATTAHI. (Fattahi, Kamran)
June 28, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff AZIZ FATTAHI. (Fattahi, Kamran)
June 28, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24007385 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff AZIZ FATTAHI. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit) (Attorney Kamran Fattahi added to party AZIZ FATTAHI(pty:pla))(Fattahi, Kamran)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Aziz Fattahi v. Aldi Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aldi Inc.
Represented By: Destiny Jarine Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1-10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: AZIZ FATTAHI
Represented By: Kamran Fattahi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?