Diana D. Santos v. Beverly Radiology Medical Group et al
| Diana D. Santos |
| Does 1-10 and Beverly Radiology Medical Group |
| 2:2019cv05756 |
| July 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Steve Kim |
| Christina A Snyder |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER DENYING REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #3 . Case is DISMISSED immediately by Judge Christina A. Snyder. MD JS-6, Case Terminated. (lc)
|
| RECOMMENDATION issued by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. Proposed Order forwarded to the District Judge for approval. Re APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support #3 . (vm) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (et) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Plaintiff Diana D. Santos. (et) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Diana D. Santos. (et) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Beverly Radiology Medical Group, Does 1-10. Case assigned to Judge Christina A. Snyder for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Diana D. Santos. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
