William Sandoval v. Metro Cruise Services, LLC et al
William Sandoval |
METRO CRUISE SERVICES, L.L.C., Signal Mutual Indemnity Association Ltd. and Metro Cruise Services, LLC |
2:2019cv05773 |
July 2, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
R Gary Klausner |
Gail J Standish |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (sw) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Metro Cruise Services, LLC, Signal Mutual Indemnity Association Ltd. (et) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (et) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff William Sandoval, identifying Plaintiff. (Detrick, Brian) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff William Sandoval. (Detrick, Brian) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff William Sandoval. (Detrick, Brian) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24024120 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff William Sandoval. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A Certified Order) (Attorney Brian Scott Detrick added to party William Sandoval(pty:pla))(Detrick, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.