Sedrak Gabriyelian v. Sterling Jewelers, Inc. et al
| Sedrak Gabriyelian |
| Sterling Jewelers Inc. d/b/a Kay Jewelers, Does 1 to 10, inclusive, Sterling Jewelers, Inc. and Sterling Jewelers, Inc. doing business as Kay Jewelers |
| 2:2019cv05823 |
| July 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J Carney |
| Suzanne H Segal |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Sterling Jewelers Inc. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Sedrak Gabriyelian. (Martinez, Jason) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Sedrak Gabriyelian, (Martinez, Jason) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Sedrak Gabriyelian. (Martinez, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24040371 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Sedrak Gabriyelian. (Attorney Jason Christopher Martinez added to party Sedrak Gabriyelian(pty:pla))(Martinez, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
