Brian Whitaker v. Hot Stone Food Group, LLC et al
Brian Whitaker |
Does 1-10 and Hot Stone Food Group, LLC |
2:2019cv05875 |
July 9, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John A Kronstadt |
Jean P Rosenbluth |
Christina A Snyder |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker, re Initial Order Setting R26 Scheduling Conference - form only, #12 served on 8/18/19. (Carson, Chris) |
Filing 18 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #15 . The document is STRICKEN for the reasons indicated in the Notice to Filer of Deficiencies #17 . The document was apparently filed in error and corrected at docket entry #16 . (jre) |
Filing 17 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint filed Defendant Hot Stone Food Group, LLC #15 . The following error(s) was/were found: (1) Incorrect document is attached to the docket entry. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (jp) |
Filing 16 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Hot Stone Food Group, LLC, (Moore, Walter) |
Filing 15 **STRICKEN** ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Certificate of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Hot Stone Food Group, LLC.(Moore, Walter) Modified on 8/15/2019 (jre). |
Filing 14 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #11 . Defendant shall file a required Certificate of Interested Parties no later than the close of business on 8/14/2019 (4:30 pm). Failure to do so will result in the striking of Defendant Hot Stone Food Group LLC's Answer #11 . (jre) |
Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint Defendant Hot Stone Food Group, LLC #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. Counsel shall file the notice on or before 8/14/2019. Failure to file the notice may result in the document being stricken. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (jp) |
Filing 12 ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b)/26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Counsel shall file a Joint Report consistent with this Order. A hearing is not necessary and, therefore, the matter is taken under submission. Upon review of the Joint Report, a scheduling order will be issued. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/18/2019. (ake) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Hot Stone Food Group, LLC.(Attorney Walter Whitman Moore added to party Hot Stone Food Group, LLC(pty:dft))(Moore, Walter) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, upon Defendant Hot Stone Food Group, LLC served on 7/19/2019, answer due 8/9/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process: Yeon Joo Lee in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 9 STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Courts Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. (shb) |
Filing 8 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge John A. Kronstadt for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:19-cv-05875 JAK(JPRx). (rn) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Hot Stone Food Group, LLC. (car) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (car) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24048512 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Brian Whitaker(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.