Robert Roman aka Adrian Arthur Barela v. Los Angeles Sheriff Department et al
| Adrian Arthur Barela and Robert Roman |
| Officer Smith, Los Angeles Sheriff Department, Steinert and Leyn |
| 2:2019cv05997 |
| July 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L Abrams |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER [IN CHAMBERS] by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. In light of the foregoing, the Court clerk is directed to resend this document, addressed to plaintiff Robert Roman, Booking #5356810, at his address of record. Plaintiff is advised that the Notice of Current Address is now due no later than September 17, 2019. To prevent confusion going forward, the Court clerk is directedto update the Court's mailing information in this case to reflect plaintiffs name as Robert Roman. [See document for details.] (Attachments: #1 Order re Plaintiffs Mailing Address) (et)
|
| Filing 10 Mail Returned addressed to Adrian Arthur Barela re Order, #6 (ch) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights),, #1 as to All Defendants. (sbou) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE OF PROCESS BY THE UNITED STATES MARSHAL by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams, (sbou)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S MAILING ADDRESS AND SERVICE OF COMPLAINT by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. No later than August 19, 2019, plaintiff shall serve and file with the Court a Notice of Current Address which shall set forth plaintiff's current mailing address (where plaintiff may be served with documents by the Court and the parties so as to be able to respond in a timely manner). (sbou)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER RE: CIVIL RIGHTS CASE by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. Until the complaint has been screened and the Court has ordered that service of process may occur, plaintiff may not proceed with service of process upon defendant(s). (See document for details.) (sbou)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams: granting #2 REQUEST for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee.. It is further ORDERED that the prisoner-plaintiff owes the Court the initial filing fee of $350.00. An initial partial filing fee of $5.00 must be paid within 30 days of the date of this order. Thereafter, monthly payments shall be forwarded to the Court in accordance with this order. (sbou)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and referred to Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (esa) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Adrian Arthur Barela. (esa) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against defendantsLeyn(No. 277174 officer LA Sheriff Department, in individual capacity), Leyn(No. 277174 officer LA Sheriff Department, in official capacity), Los Angeles Sheriff Department, Smith(Sheriff Deputy employee, in individual capacity), Smith(Sheriff Deputy employee, in official capacity), Steinert(No. 439201, officer LA Sheriff Department, in individual capacity), Steinert(No. 439201, officer LA Sheriff Department, in official capacity) pursuant to 42 USC 1983pr. Case assigned to Judge Dale S. Fischer and referred to Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams, filed by plaintiff Adrian Arthur Barela. (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
