Steven Cox et al v. Defenders, Inc. et al
| Oscar Sepulveda, Steven Cox and Frank Mata |
| Does 1 through 10, inclusive and Defenders, Inc. |
| 2:2019cv06019 |
| July 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Patrick J Walsh |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 11/4/2019 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi)
|
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by defendant Defenders, Inc., Does, Notice to Superior Court and to Adverse Party of Defendant's Filing of Notice of Removal of Action To the United States District Court for the Central District of California served on 07/19/2019. (Farber, Mia) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by defendant Defenders, Inc., re Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #4 , Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #6 , Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #5 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 served on 07/12/2019. (Farber, Mia) |
|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. (lh) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Defenders, Inc. (Farber, Mia) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Defenders, Inc., (Farber, Mia) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Defenders, Inc.. (Farber, Mia) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court, Santa Barbara Cook Division, case number 19CV02559 Receipt No: 0973-24076054 - Fee: $400, filed by defendant Defenders, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Mark Colucci re Corporate Citizenship, #2 Declaration of Christen Lagore re Payroll, #3 Declaration of Mia Farber In Support of Removal, #4 Exhibit A - Complaint, #5 Exhibit B - Answer & Notice of Related Cases, #6 Exhibit C- Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Mia D Farber added to party Defenders, Inc.(pty:dft))(Farber, Mia) |
| NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Class Action Complaint, filed by Defendant Defenders, Inc. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL, DOCUMENT 1-5) (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT against Defendants Defenders, Inc., Does 1 through 10. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiffs Steven Cox, Oscar Sepulveda, Frank Mata. (FILED IN SANTA BARBARA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 5/14/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL, DOCUMENT 1-4 #1 ) (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
