Catherine Ann Gallagher v. Swarovski North America Limited
| Catherine Ann Gallagher |
| SWAROVSKI NORTH AMERICA LIMITED, a Rhode Island corporation, Swarovski North America Limited and DOES 1 to 10, inclusive (11-50 TERMED) |
| 2:2019cv06052 |
| July 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John E McDermott |
| John F Walter |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. The purpose of this Order is to notify the parties and their counsel of the deadlines and the schedule that will govern this action. Pretrial Conference set for 5/8/2020 at 10:00 AM. Hearing on Motions in Limine; Disputed Jury Instructions set for 5/15/2020 at 10:00 AM. Jury Trial set for 5/26/2020 at 8:30 AM. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (iv)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER VACATING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE, REFERRAL TO PRIVATE MEDIATION, and DISMISSING ANY UNSERVED DOE DEFENDANTS by Judge John F. Walter. The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report and finds that a Scheduling Conference is not necessary. The hearing on August 26, 2019 is vacated and taken off calendar. A Scheduling and Case Management Order will issue. Any unserved DOE defendants are dismissed at this time. The Court, having considered the parties' Request: ADR Procedure Selection, the Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program, or the report submitted by the parties pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and Civil L.R. 26-1, hereby: ORDERS this case referred to: ADR PROCEDURE NO. 3: (Private mediation). The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than: January 6, 2020. The Joint Report re: Results of Settlement Conference due on: January 10, 2020. (iv)
|
| Filing 17 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 3-5 or 7-10 days, filed by Defendant Swarovski North America Limited.. (Howard, Rachel) |
| Filing 16 Plaintiff's NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Catherine Ann Gallagher, identifying Miracle Mile Law Group, LLP.; Justin Hanassab, counsel for Plaintiff; Steven Azizi, Counsel for Plaintiff.. (Hanassab, Justin) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND RELATED DEADLINES #14 by Judge John F. Walter. DENIED BY ORDER OF THE COURT. (iv)
|
| Filing 14 Joint STIPULATION to Continue Scheduling Conference from August 26, 2019 to September 23, 2019 filed by Defendant Swarovski North America Limited. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Rachel Howard, #2 Proposed Order)(Howard, Rachel) |
| Filing 13 DECLARATION of Nancy Pritikin Lead Trial Counsel filed by Defendant Swarovski North America Limited. (Pritikin, Nancy) |
| Filing 12 DECLARATION of Justin Hanassab Lead Trial Counsel filed by Plaintiff Catherine Ann Gallagher. (Hanassab, Justin) |
| Filing 11 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Plaintiff Catherine Ann Gallagher.. (Hanassab, Justin) |
| Filing 10 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Justin Hanassab counsel for Plaintiff Catherine Ann Gallagher. Adding Justin Hanassab as counsel of record for Catherine Ann Gallagher for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Catherine Ann Gallagher. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Hanassab, Justin) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) DEFENDANTS ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS UNVERIFIED COMPLAINT filed by Defendant Swarovski North America Limited.(Howard, Rachel) |
|
Filing 8
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS): COURT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter: Counsel are hereby notified that a Scheduling Conference has been set for 8/26/2019 at 01:15 PM before Judge John F. Walter in Courtroom 7A, 350 W. 1st St, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Lead Trial Counsel shall attend all proceedings before this Court, including the Scheduling Conference. Counsel are directed to comply with Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 26-1 in a timely fashion and to file a Joint Report, on or before 8/12/2019. (jp)
|
|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (jp)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 DECLARATION of John Ericson re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant SWAROVSKI NORTH AMERICA LIMITED, a Rhode Island corporation. (Howard, Rachel) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Catherine Ann Gallagher in Los Angeles Superior Court on 6/11/2019, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties (Howard, Rachel) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant SWAROVSKI NORTH AMERICA LIMITED, a Rhode Island corporation. (Howard, Rachel) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 19STCV20384 Receipt No: 0973-24083093 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant SWAROVSKI NORTH AMERICA LIMITED, a Rhode Island corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A&B to Notice of Removal, #2 Proof of Service) (Attorney Rachel P Howard added to party SWAROVSKI NORTH AMERICA LIMITED, a Rhode Island corporation(pty:dft))(Howard, Rachel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
