Richard Jose Dupree v. M. Bell et al
Richard Jose Dupree, Jr. and Hard |
R. Javlden, Sgt. Gamboa, M. Bell, M. Avila and Warden Sexton |
2:2019cv06063 |
July 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
R Gary Klausner |
Suzanne H Segal |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER Re Request to proceed Without prepayment of Filing Fees by Judge R. Gary Klausner that the Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees (CV-93) #2 DENIED, with leave to amend with 30 days. (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER SPECIFICS). (jp) |
RECOMMENDATION issued by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. Re NOTICE OF FILING OF COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES OR REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (CV-93) #2 . Proposed Order forwarded to the District Judge for approval.(mr) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and referred to Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. (ghap) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING OF COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES OR REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (CV-93). (ghap) |
Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants M. Avila, M. Bell, Gamboa, R. Javlden, Sexton pursuant to 42:1983. Case assigned to Judge R. Gary Klausner and referred to Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal., filed by plaintiff Richard Jose Dupree, Jr. (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.