William James Mathew Wallace II v. Alex Villanueva et al
Plaintiff: William James Mathew Wallace, II
Defendant: County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Sheriff Alex Villanueva and City of Los Angeles
Case Number: 2:2019cv06128
Filed: July 16, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Fernando M Olguin
Referring Judge: Gail J Standish
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish, ORDERING Letter and loose documents submitted by Plaintiff William James Mathew Wallace, II received on 9/6/19 is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: Pursuant to the Court's Order of September 6, 2019 [Dkt. 9], Plaintiff must cease submitting piecemeal documents and must file a single document First Amended Complaint to proceed. (ec)
September 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish rejecting and returning documents, and directing Plaintiff to comply with respect to resubmitted documents. As a result of the September 6 Order, the Complaint no longer is operative. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed in this action, he must submit a First Amended Complaint that is timely and "complete, without reference to previously submitted Complaint or exhibits." A "complaint" may not consist of piecemeal documents, motions, loose envelopes, scraps of paper, jumbled exhibits, and the like, as Plaintiff has sought to do in this case. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed in this action, he must submit a First Amended Complaint that is a single document which is complete in itself. It must identify all defendants and include all claims, and if Plaintiff wishes to incorporate exhibits, they must be attached to the First Amended Complaint itself. (ec)
September 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 AMENDED ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Re Order on Request for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fees #7 . IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees is: DENIED, with leave to amend within 30 days. Plaintiff may re-submit the IFP application and Complaint to this Court, if submitted with the Certified Trust Account Statement and Disbursement Authorization. Plaintiff shall utilize the same case number. If plaintiff fails to submit the required documents within 30 days, this case shall be DISMISSED. (iv)
September 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES #2 by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees is: DENIED. Plaintiff SHALL PAY THE FILING FEES IN FULL within 30 days or this case will be dismissed. (iv)
September 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER #4 by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED. (iv)
August 28, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF REFERRAL OF MATTER to the Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to the directive of Judge Fernando M. Olguin, the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order #4 filed on August 21, 2019 is referred to Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish for a proposed Order. (cw)
August 21, 2019 Filing 4 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Plaintiff William James Mathew Wallace, II. (ec)
July 16, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and referred to Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (esa)
July 16, 2019 Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff William James Mathew Wallace, II. (esa)
July 16, 2019 Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against defendants City of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles, Alex Villanueva pursuant to 42 USC 1983pr. Case assigned to Judge Fernando M. Olguin and referred to Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish, filed by plaintiff William James Mathew Wallace, II. (esa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: William James Mathew Wallace II v. Alex Villanueva et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William James Mathew Wallace, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County of Los Angeles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Los Angeles Sheriff Alex Villanueva
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Los Angeles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?