Xerox Corporation v. Arrowhead Press Inc et al
| Xerox Corporation |
| Arrowhead Press Inc. and Diana M. Sims |
| 2:2019cv06142 |
| July 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Virginia A Phillips |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 Affidavit and Request for Issuance of Writ of Execution filed by Plaintiff Xerox Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Writ of Execution)(Cox, Pamela) |
| Filing 21 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY WRIT OF EXECUTION. The document is being returned to you for correction of: Writ/abstract must contain the name(s) and address(es) of the judgment debtor. (bm) |
| Filing 20 Affidavit and Request for Issuance of Writ of Execution filed by Plaintiff Xerox Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Writ of Execution)(Cox, Pamela) |
| Filing 19 WRIT of Writ of Execution Returned Unexecuted (Cox, Pamela) |
| Filing 18 ABSTRACT of Judgment issued in favor of Plaintiff Xerox Corporation and against Arrowhead Press Inc. in the principal amount of $ 734,428.00, interest in the amount of $ 0.00, attorneys fees of $ 0.00, costs of $ 0.00. RE: MISC - Registration of Judgment from Another District (AO-451) #1 (bm) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY WRIT OF EXECUTION. The document is being returned to you for correction of: No year in front of the case number. (bm) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY WRIT OF EXECUTION. The document is being returned to you for correction of: Last four digits of the judgment debtors drivers license and social security number were not indicated on the Abstract of Judgment. If these numbers are unknown, place an X in the box labeled Unknown. (bm) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY WRIT OF EXECUTION. The document is being returned to you for correction of: Attested date must be left blank. (bm) |
Filing 14
ORDER FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS BY REGISTERED PROCESS SERVER #12 by Judge Virginia A. Phillips: Pursuant to the request of Plaintiff, XEROX CORPORATION and Rules 4.1(a) and 69 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure WIN WIN-ALSSI, INC., who employs persons at least 18 years of age, of suitable discretion and not a party to the within action, is authorized and appointed to serve the writs in the above case. The U.S. Marshals Office will remain the levying officer. (bm)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of New Case Number and Judge Assignment by Clerk. This case is hereby converted from case type MC to case type CV because subsequent filings have changed the nature of the case. A new case number has therefore been assigned to this case. District Judge Virginia A. Phillips is assigned to this new case number 2:19-cv-06142 - VAP. All future documents must be filed under this new case number. The previous case number, 2:19-mc-00070 - UA, is hereby terminated. (lh) |
| Filing 12 First REQUEST for Order for Service by Process by Registered Process Server filed by Plaintiff Xerox Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Cox, Pamela) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Xerox Corporation, re Notice of New Case Number / Judge Assignment (CV-15) - optional html form, #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , MISC - Registration of Judgment from Another District (AO-451) #1 served on June 25, 2019. (Cox, Pamela) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Xerox Corporation, re Notice of New Case Number / Judge Assignment (CV-15) - optional html form, #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , MISC - Registration of Judgment from Another District (AO-451) #1 served on June 25, 2019. (Cox, Pamela) |
| Filing 9 Writ of Execution issued against Arrowhead Press Inc, Diana M Sims re: Affidavit and Request for Issuance of Writ of Execution #8 . (bm) |
| Filing 8 Affidavit and Request for Issuance of Writ of Execution filed by Plaintiff Xerox Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Writ of Execution)(Cox, Pamela) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY WRIT OF EXECUTION. The document is being returned to you for correction of: Entered date listed on the writ/abstract does not match the entered date of the judgment/order. If there are no amounts for principal, attorney fees, costs or interest, please enter a zero (0) on each line. (lom) |
| Filing 6 Affidavit and Request for Issuance of Writ of Execution filed by Plaintiff Xerox Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Cox, Pamela) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY WRIT OF EXECUTION. The document is being returned to you for correction of: CV-23 Writ should have been submitted as a separate, additional attachment to the CV-24 Affidavit and Request for Issuance of Writ of Execution. (bm) |
| Filing 4 Affidavit and Request for Issuance of Writ of Execution filed by Plaintiff Xerox Corporation. (Cox, Pamela) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of New Case Number by Clerk. This case is hereby converted from case type CV to case type MC because the incorrect case type was used at case opening. A new case number has therefore been assigned to this case. All future documents must be filed under the new case number, which is 2:19-mc-00070-UA. The previous case number, 2:19-cv-04759, is hereby terminated. (jp) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Xerox Corporation. (Cox, Pamela) |
| Filing 1 REGISTRATION OF JUDGMENT FROM ANOTHER DISTRICT Receipt No: 0973-23836570 - Fee: $47, filed by Plaintiff, Xerox Corporation Xerox Corporation. (Attorney Pamela L Cox added to party Xerox Corporation(pty:pla))(Cox, Pamela) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
