Gloria Rocha v. Andrew Saul
Plaintiff: Gloria Rocha
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Case Number: 2:2019cv06145
Filed: July 17, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Gail J Standish
Referring Judge: John F Walter
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 7, 2019 Filing 11 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Andrew Saul. (Attorney Amanda Schapel added to party Andrew Saul(pty:dft))(Schapel, Amanda)
July 19, 2019 Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Gloria Rocha, upon Defendant Andrew Saul served on 7/19/2019, answer due 11/18/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Attorney General. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Deborah L. Stachel, Regional Chief Counsel, Office of the Regional Chief Counsel-Region IX. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Koenig, Andrew)
July 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES by Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (ec)
July 18, 2019 Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Andrew Saul. (ec)
July 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish: granting #2 Request to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (ec)
July 18, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and referred to Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (et)
July 17, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Gloria Rocha, identifying Joe Solomon. (Koenig, Andrew)
July 17, 2019 Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Gloria Rocha. (Koenig, Andrew)
July 17, 2019 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Gloria Rocha. (Koenig, Andrew)
July 17, 2019 Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Gloria Rocha. (Koenig, Andrew)
July 17, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Gloria Rocha. (Attorney Andrew Thomas Koenig added to party Gloria Rocha(pty:pla))(Koenig, Andrew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gloria Rocha v. Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Represented By: Amanda Schapel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gloria Rocha
Represented By: Andrew Thomas Koenig
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?