A.S.M.V. et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
| A. C. V., V. R. V. and A. S.M. V. |
| County of Los Angeles and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2019cv06158 |
| July 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L Abrams |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER RE PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM OF MINOR A.C.V. by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. Granting #12 PETITION to Appoint Guardian ad Litem. Appointing Victoria K. Castro as Guardian ad Litem for A.C.V. (et)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER RE PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM OF MINOR V.R.V. by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. Granting #11 PETITION to Appoint Guardian ad Litem. Appointing Victoria K. Castro as Guardian ad Litem for V.R.V. (et)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER RE PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM OF MINOR A.S.M.V. by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. Granting #10 PETITION to Appoint Guardian ad Litem. Appointing Victoria K. Castro as Guardian ad Litem for A.S.M.V. (et)
|
| Filing 12 PETITION for Appointment of Victoria K. Castro as Guardian ad Litem for A.C.V. filed by Plaintiff A. C. V.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Guizar, Humberto) |
| Filing 11 PETITION for Appointment of Victoria K. Castro as Guardian ad Litem for V.R.V. filed by Plaintiff V. R. V.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Guizar, Humberto) |
| Filing 10 PETITION for Appointment of Victoria K. Castro as Guardian ad Litem for A.S.M.V. filed by Plaintiff A. S.M. V.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Guizar, Humberto) |
|
Filing 9
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): It appears a guardian ad litem is named in this case but no Petition seeking such appointment has been filed. A Petition for the Appointment of a Guardian Ad Litem must be filed when the appointment of a guardian ad litem is required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 17(c)(2). See Local Rule 171. Counsel must file a Petition for the Appointment of a Guardian Ad Litem immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 837. 17. (esa) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant County of Los Angeles. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (esa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs All Plaintiffs, (Guizar, Humberto) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs A. S.M. V., A. C. V., V. R. V.. (Guizar, Humberto) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs A. S.M. V., A. C. V., V. R. V.. (Guizar, Humberto) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24100247 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiffs A. S.M. V., Victoria K. Castro, A. C. V., V. R. V.. (Attorney Humberto M Guizar added to party Victoria K. Castro(pty:pla), Attorney Humberto M Guizar added to party A. S.M. V.(pty:pla), Attorney Humberto M Guizar added to party A. C. V.(pty:pla), Attorney Humberto M Guizar added to party V. R. V.(pty:pla))(Guizar, Humberto) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
