Rothschild Patent Imaging LLC v. QNAP Inc.
Plaintiff: Rothschild Patent Imaging LLC
Defendant: QNAP Inc.
Case Number: 2:2019cv06164
Filed: July 17, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John A Kronstadt
Referring Judge: Michael R Wilner
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER RE SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT #23 by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Defendant's response to the Complaint is extended by fourteen (29) days from September 12, 2019 to October 11, 2019. IT IS SO ORDERED. (lom)
August 29, 2019 Filing 23 Second STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Initial Complaint filed by defendant QNAP Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Gikkas, Nicolas)
August 29, 2019 Filing 22 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Nicolas S Gikkas on behalf of Defendant QNAP Inc. (Attorney Nicolas S Gikkas added to party QNAP Inc. (pty:dft))(Gikkas, Nicolas)
August 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER Re Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint By Not More Than 30 Days (L.R. 8-3) (Dkt. #20 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt. The Stipulated Motion is GRANTED and Defendant QNAP, Inc., shall answer or otherwise respond on or before 9/12/2019. (jp)
August 12, 2019 Filing 20 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to QNAP Inc. answer now due 9/12/2019, filed by Plaintiff Rothschild Patent Imaging LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(McArthur, M)
August 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER TO STRIKE ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS by Judge John A. Kronstadt: the following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order: MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer #18 , for the following reasons: (1) Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or not timely; (2) The docket text and the title of the document do not match. Motions are set for hearing and briefed pursuant to L.R. 6-1 and 7. Accordingly, the Motion is STRICKEN. Counsel shall refile the document as a stipulation using the proper event codes. (jp)
August 9, 2019 Filing 18 [STRICKEN PER ORDER DATED 08/09/2019, SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. #19 ] - NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer, NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Extend Time to File Answer to 9/12/2019 filed by Plaintiff Rothschild Patent Imaging LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (McArthur, M). Modified on 8/9/2019 (jp).
August 4, 2019 Filing 17 SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Rothschild Patent Imaging LLC, upon Defendant QNAP Inc. served on 7/23/2019, answer due 8/13/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (McArthur, M)
July 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER by Judge John A. Kronstadt: granting #11 , #15 Non-Resident Attorney Jay B Johnson APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Rothschild Patent Imaging LLC, designating M Grant McArthur as local counsel. (jp)
July 22, 2019 Filing 15 APPLICATION to AMEND APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jay B. Johnson to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Rothschild Patent Imaging LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24116759) #11 filed by plaintiff Rothschild Patent Imaging LLC. (McArthur, M)
July 22, 2019 Filing 14 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jay B. Johnson to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Rothschild Patent Imaging LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24116759) #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Hearing date set, but no hearing required. Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(d) Certificate of Good Standing not attached for every state court listed to which the applicant has been admitted. Other error(s) with document(s): Certificates of Good Standing have been required since 9/08. See LR 83-2.1.3.3. See Instructions for Applicants (1) (G-64). (lt)
July 22, 2019 Filing 13 STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT. (SEE ORDER FOR SPECIFICS). (jp)
July 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER TO TRANSFER CASE TO THE PATENT PILOT PROGRAM by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Case transferred from Judge Otis D. Wright, II to Judge John A. Kronstadt for all further proceedings. Case number now reads 2:10-cv-06164 JAK(MRWx). (rn)
July 19, 2019 Filing 11 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jay B. Johnson to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Rothschild Patent Imaging LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24116759) filed by Plaintiff Rothschild Patent Imaging LLC. Application set for hearing on 7/22/2019 at 01:30 PM before Judge Otis D. Wright II. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE) (McArthur, M)
July 18, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney D Bradley Kizzia. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et)
July 18, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Jay B Johnson. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et)
July 18, 2019 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant QNAP Inc. (et)
July 18, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
July 18, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (et)
July 17, 2019 Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Rothschild Patent Imaging LLC. (McArthur, M)
July 17, 2019 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Rothschild Patent Imaging LLC, identifying Patent Asset Management. (McArthur, M)
July 17, 2019 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Rothschild Patent Imaging LLC. (McArthur, M)
July 17, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Rothschild Patent Imaging LLC. (McArthur, M)
July 17, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24101063 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Rothschild Patent Imaging LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit US Patent 9,936,086) (Attorney M Grant McArthur added to party Rothschild Patent Imaging LLC(pty:pla))(McArthur, M)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rothschild Patent Imaging LLC v. QNAP Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: QNAP Inc.
Represented By: Nicolas S Gikkas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rothschild Patent Imaging LLC
Represented By: M Grant McArthur
Represented By: Jay B Johnson
Represented By: Kirk J Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?