Danielle Cortez et al v. FCA US LLC, et al
Danielle Cortez and David Spalliero |
FCA US LLC and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
2:2019cv06197 |
July 18, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Michael W Fitzgerald |
Frederick F Mumm |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (esa) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant FCA US LLC, (Chung, Michael) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant FCA US LLC. (Chung, Michael) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 19STCV20918 Receipt No: 0973-24106947 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant FCA US LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit State Court Answer, #3 Exhibit) (Attorney Michael Chung added to party FCA US LLC(pty:dft))(Chung, Michael) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does, FCA US LLC, filed by plaintiffs Danielle Cortez, David Spalliero. (Filed in state court 6/14/19, submitted as document 1, attachment 1) (esa) |
CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND filed by defendant FCA US LLC. (Filed in state court 7/18/19, submitted as document 1, attachment 2)(esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.