Daniel Schwartz v. Bai Brands LLC et al
Mr. Daniel Schwartz |
Dr Pepper Snapple Group Inc, Bai Brands LLC, Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc. and Bai Brands, LLC |
2:2019cv06249 |
July 19, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Fernando M Olguin |
Rozella A Oliver |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Order to Show Cause #10 is hereby discharged. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vdr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 11 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid (400.00 paid on 07/19/2019, receipt number 26IUCF03), filed by Plaintiff Daniel Schwartz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Bernardino, Rafael) |
Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER (In Chambers) Order to Show Cause Re: Jurisdiction by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Based on the foregoing, IT IS ORDERED that no later than August 12, 2019, plaintiff shall file a First Amended Complaint addressing the deficiencies noted above. Failure to file a First Amended Complaint by the deadline set forth above shall be deemed as consent to the dismissal of the action without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction and/or failure to comply with a court order. (lom) |
Filing 9 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vdr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Peter N. Wasylyk. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (lh) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #2 . The following error(s) was found: The date and signature line must be left blank. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (lh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (lh) |
Filing 4 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Daniel Schwartz, (Bernardino, Rafael) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Daniel Schwartz. (Bernardino, Rafael) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Daniel Schwartz. (Bernardino, Rafael) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24115705 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Daniel Schwartz. (Attorney Rafael Bernardino, Jr added to party Daniel Schwartz(pty:pla))(Bernardino, Rafael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.