Michael Slack v. Sharp Group LLC et al
| Michael Slack |
| Does 1-10 and Sharp Group LLC |
| 2:2019cv06270 |
| July 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Virginia A Phillips |
| Alka Sagar |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (vv) |
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (vv)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Sharp Group LLC. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Virginia A. Phillips and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (lh) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Michael Slack, (Shahriari, Peter) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Michael Slack. (Shahriari, Peter) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Michael Slack. (Shahriari, Peter) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24118818 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Michael Slack. (Attorney Peter Shahriari added to party Michael Slack(pty:pla))(Shahriari, Peter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
