Gael F. Grob v. T Mobile USA, Inc. et al
| GAEL F. GROB |
| DOES 1 to 50, inclusive, T-Mobile USA, Inc. a Delaware corporation and T Mobile USA, Inc. |
| 2:2019cv06352 |
| July 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J Carney |
| Alicia G Rosenberg |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF INTENT upon filing of the complaint by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Scheduling order to be issued on October 3, 2019. (gga) |
Filing 12
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge Cormac J. Carney for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:19-cv-06352 CJC(AGRx). (rn)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Ronald S.W. Lew to Judge Christina A. Snyder for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:19-cv-06352 CAS(AGRx). (rn)
|
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant T Mobile USA, Inc., ECF DOC#8 and ECF DOC#9 served on July 25, 2019. (Miska, Perry) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S. W. Lew and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (jtil) |
| CONFORMED ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendants T Mobile USA, Inc. in Los Angeles Superior Court on 7/22/2019, attached as Exhibit B. (jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Gael F. Grob in Los Angeles Superior Court on 6/14/2019, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc. a Delaware corporation, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on July 23, 2019. (Miska, Perry) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Pendency of Other Action or Proceeding filed by Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc. a Delaware corporation. (Miska, Perry) |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc. a Delaware corporation identifying T-Mobile US, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Miska, Perry) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc. a Delaware corporation, identifying Plaintiff Gael F. Grob; Plaintiff Emmanuel Salgado; Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc.; T-Mobile US, Inc.;Deutsche Telekom Holding B.V.; T-Mobile Global Holding GmbH; T-Mobile Global Zwischenholding GmbH; Deutsche Telekom AG, an Aktiengesellschaft. (Miska, Perry) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Latisha Moss re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc. a Delaware corporation. (Miska, Perry) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc. a Delaware corporation. (Miska, Perry) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 19STCV20707 Receipt No: 0973-24131707 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc. a Delaware corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Attorney Perry K Miska, Jr added to party T-Mobile USA, Inc. a Delaware corporation(pty:dft))(Miska, Perry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
