Qiu Lan He v. Wen Yang, et al
Plaintiff: Qiu Lan He
Defendant: Roger Luo, Wen Yang, Magic Oriental, Inc. and Longze Film Limited Company
Case Number: 2:2019cv06417
Filed: July 24, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Ronald SW Lew
Referring Judge: Jean P Rosenbluth
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 TEXT ONLY ORDER (IN CHABMERS) by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: The hearing on the Motion to Dismiss #8 , set for 9/17/2019, at 10:00 AM, is hereby vacated and taken OFF-CALENDAR. The motion is suitable for decision without oral argument and stands SUBMITTED. No appearance necessary on 9/17/2019. The Court's ruling will issue. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jre)
September 3, 2019 Filing 11 REPLY in support of motion NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction - In the Alternative, Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Stay or Dismiss Action Pending Completion of Arbitration; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof; Declaratio #8 - Defendant Wen Yang's Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Complaint for Lack of Federal Jurisdiction; in the Alternative, Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Stay or Dismiss Action Pending Completion of Arbitration filed by Defendant Wen Yang. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Michel, Allen)
August 30, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Response in Opposition to Motion #9 . The following error(s) was/were found: Case number is incorrect or missing. Other error(s) with document(s): The case number is missing the judge initials. The complete case number is 2:19-cv-06417-RSWL (JPRx). This case number must appear on all documents filed with the Court.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (shb)
August 29, 2019 Filing 9 OPPOSITION Motion to Dismiss, and Alternatively Motion To Compel Arbitration filed by Plaintiff Qiu Lan He. (Bell, Jeffrey)
August 14, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction - In the Alternative, Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Stay or Dismiss Action Pending Completion of Arbitration; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof; Declaration of Wen Yang; Declaration of Allen Michel; Exhibits filed by defendant Wen Yang. Motion set for hearing on 9/17/2019 at 10:00 AM before Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. (Attorney Allen L Michel added to party Wen Yang(pty:dft)) (Michel, Allen)
July 24, 2019 Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendants Longze Film Limited Company, Roger Luo, Magic Oriental, Inc., Wen Yang. (esa)
July 24, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa)
July 24, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S. W. Lew and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (esa)
July 24, 2019 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff QIU LAN HE. (Bell, Jeffrey)
July 24, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff QIU LAN HE, (Bell, Jeffrey)
July 24, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff QIU LAN HE. (Bell, Jeffrey)
July 24, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24142073 - Fee: $400, filed by PLAINTIFF QIU LAN HE. (Attorney Jeffrey Thomas Bell added to party QIU LAN HE(pty:pla))(Bell, Jeffrey)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Qiu Lan He v. Wen Yang, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roger Luo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wen Yang
Represented By: Allen L Michel
Represented By: Won M Park
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Magic Oriental, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Longze Film Limited Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Qiu Lan He
Represented By: Jeffrey Thomas Bell
Represented By: Rick Ma
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?