Sundesa, LLC v. IQ Formulations, LLC
| Sundesa, LLC |
| IQ Formulations, LLC and IQ Formulations, LLC a Florida limited liability company doing business as Metabolic Nutrition |
| 2:2019cv06467 |
| July 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| Andre Birotte |
| Christina A Snyder |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to IQ Formulations, LLC answer now due 10/4/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Sundesa, LLC.(Williams, David) |
Filing 23
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE PRO HAC VICE APPLICATIONS ON BEHALF OF LARRY R. LAYCOCK AND TREVOR L. CLARK by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court DENIES AS MOOT Plaintiff Sundesa, LLC's Motion to Extend Deadline to File Pro Hac Vice Applications on behalf of Larry R. Laycock and Trevor L. Clark #14 . Plaintiff filed the subject Pro Hac Vice applications on August 7, and they were granted on August 12. At that point Plaintiff should have filed a Notice of Withdrawal withdrawing the motion because it was moot. (gk)
|
| Filing 22 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Sundesa, LLC, upon Defendant IQ Formulations, LLC served on 8/16/2019, answer due 9/6/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Greg Edouard - Legal Assistant in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Williams, David) |
|
Filing 21
ORDER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Trevor L. Clark to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Sundesa, LLC, designating David J. Williams as local counsel #19 . (gk)
|
|
Filing 20
ORDER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Larry R. Laycock to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Sundesa, LLC, designating David J. Williams as local counsel #18 . (gk)
|
| Filing 19 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Trevor L. Clark to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Sundesa, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24222305) filed by Plaintiff Sundesa, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Williams, David) |
| Filing 18 Corrected APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Larry R. Laycock to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Sundesa, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400.00 Previously Paid on 8/5/2019, Receipt No. 0973-24208136) filed by Plaintiff Sundesa, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Williams, David) |
| Filing 17 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS by Clerk RE: Pro Hac Vice Application filed 8/5/2019 #15 . The document is stricken. (gk) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Larry R. Laycock to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Sundesa, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24208136) #15 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 5-4.3.4 Application not hand-signed. Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(a) Application not complete: state and/or federal courts to which the applicant has been admitted are not listed. (lt) |
| Filing 15 * STRICKEN * APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Larry R. Laycock to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Sundesa, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24208136) filed by Plaintiff Sundesa, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Williams, David) ** DOCUMENT STRICKEN PURSUANT TO THE RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS FILED 8/7/2019 #17 ** Modified on 8/7/2019 (gk). |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Extension of Time to File Pro Hac Vice Applications filed by Plaintiff Sundesa, LLC. Motion set for hearing on 8/30/2019 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Williams, David) |
|
Filing 13
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER TO TRANSFER CASE TO THE PATENT PILOT PROGRAM by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. Case transferred from Judge Stephen V. Wilson to Judge Andre Birotte Jr for all further proceedings. Case number now reads 2:19-cv-06467 AB(MAAx). (rn)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge Stephen V. Wilson for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:19-cv-06467 SVW(MAAx). (rn)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Trevor L. Clark. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (esa) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Larry R. Laycock. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (esa) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant IQ Formulations, LLC. (esa) |
| Filing 7 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Sundesa, LLC. (Williams, David) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (esa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Sundesa, LLC, (Williams, David) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Sundesa, LLC. (Williams, David) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Sundesa, LLC. (Williams, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24148929 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Sundesa, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney David John Williams added to party Sundesa, LLC(pty:pla))(Williams, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
