City of North Miami Beach Police Officers' and Firefighters' Retirement Plan v. National General Holdings Corp. et al
| City of North Miami Beach Police Officers' and Firefighters' Retirement Plan |
| Barry Karfunkel, National General Holdings Corp. and Michael Weiner |
| 2:2019cv06468 |
| July 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J Carney |
| Andrew J Guilford |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Karen E Scott |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Transfer Case to Southern District of New York filed by Defendants Barry Karfunkel, National General Holdings Corp., Michael Weiner. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants' Motion to Transfer, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Declaration of Jeffrey Weissmann) (Vance, Robert) |
Filing 19
ORDER RE SCHEDULING #18 by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. Pursuant to the stipulation between the Parties, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS: Defendants may defer any answer or other response until after an order is entered regarding the Court's appointment of a Lead Plaintiff and approval of Lead Plaintiff's selection of Lead Counsel pursuant to the PSLRA, 15 U S C 78u-4(a)(3) (See Order for further details. (es)
|
| Filing 18 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint and Motion to Transfer filed by Defendants Barry Karfunkel, National General Holdings Corp., Michael Weiner. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Vance, Robert) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Robert Patrick Vance, Jr on behalf of Defendants Barry Karfunkel, National General Holdings Corp., Michael Weiner (Attorney Robert Patrick Vance, Jr added to party Barry Karfunkel(pty:dft), Attorney Robert Patrick Vance, Jr added to party National General Holdings Corp.(pty:dft), Attorney Robert Patrick Vance, Jr added to party Michael Weiner(pty:dft))(Vance, Robert) |
| Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff City of North Miami Beach Police Officers' and Firefighters' Retirement Plan, upon Defendant Barry Karfunkel served on 7/29/2019, answer due 8/19/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Evelin Mestanza, Person Authorized to Accept Service in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Cochran, Brian) |
| Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff City of North Miami Beach Police Officers' and Firefighters' Retirement Plan, upon Defendant Michael Weiner served on 7/29/2019, answer due 8/19/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Evelin Mestanza, Person Authorized to Accept Service in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Cochran, Brian) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff City of North Miami Beach Police Officers' and Firefighters' Retirement Plan, upon Defendant National General Holdings Corp. served on 7/29/2019, answer due 8/19/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Evelin Mestanza, Person Authorized to Accept Service in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Cochran, Brian) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 19-03-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 8:17-ml-02797 AG(KESx). Case transferred from Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth to Judge Andrew J. Guilford and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:19-cv-06468 AG(KESx). Signed by Judge Andrew J. Guilford(rn) (rn).
|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE filed by Pro Hac Vice attorney Pedro A. Herrera on behalf of Plaintiff City of North Miami Beach Police Officers' and Firefighters' Retirement Plan. RE: Notice of Filing Fee Due. PHV fee N/A. Attorney will not be appearing as attorney of record on this case. (lt) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Pro Hac Vice attorney Robert A. Sugarman on behalf of Plaintiff City of North Miami Beach Police Officers' and Firefighters' Retirement Plan. RE: Notice of Filing Fee Due. PHV fee N/A. Attorney will not be appearing as attorney of record on this case. (lt) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Pedro A. Herrera. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (esa) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Robert A. Sugarman. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (esa) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendants Barry Karfunkel, National General Holdings Corp., Michael Weiner. (esa) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by plaintiff City of North Miami Beach Police Officers' and Firefighters' Retirement Plan. Related Case(s): 17-ml-02797-AJG (KESx) (Cochran, Brian) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff City of North Miami Beach Police Officers' and Firefighters' Retirement Plan, identifying City of North Miami Beach Police Officers' and Firefighters' Retirement Plan. (Cochran, Brian) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiff City of North Miami Beach Police Officers' and Firefighters' Retirement Plan. (Cochran, Brian) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff City of North Miami Beach Police Officers' and Firefighters' Retirement Plan. (Cochran, Brian) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24148968 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff City of North Miami Beach Police Officers' and Firefighters' Retirement Plan. (Attorney Brian Edward Cochran added to party City of North Miami Beach Police Officers' and Firefighters' Retirement Plan(pty:pla))(Cochran, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
