Armando Hernandez v. Ralph Diaz
| Armando Hernandez |
| Ralph Diaz |
| 2:2019cv06486 |
| July 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Sheri Pym |
| James V Selna |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym: Granting #8 REQUEST for Extension of Time. Respondent may file a Motion to Dismiss the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus on or before October 11, 2019, or an Answer on or before October 26, 2019. (kca)
|
| Filing 8 First APPLICATION for Extension of Time to File Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Respondent Ralph Diaz. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Wagner, Gregory) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Gregory B Wagner on behalf of Respondent Ralph Diaz (Attorney Gregory B Wagner added to party Ralph Diaz(pty:res))(Wagner, Gregory) |
|
Filing 6
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym: Order Granting Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Accordingly, the $5.00 filing fee is ordered WAIVED. (kca)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER REQUIRING ANSWER/RETURN TO PETITION by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS), Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 Consent) (kca)
|
| Filing 4 DECLARATION in Support of Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Petitioner Armando Hernandez. (sbou) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge James V. Selna and referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (et) |
| Filing 2 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Petitioner Armando Hernandez. (et) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254). Case assigned to Judge James V. Selna and referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (Filing fee $ 5 FEE DUE.), filed by Petitioner Armando Hernandez. (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Armando Hernandez v. Ralph Diaz | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Armando Hernandez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Ralph Diaz | |
| Represented By: | Gregory B Wagner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
