M. Papadopoulos Dental Corp. v. Medical Synergy, Inc.
M. PAPADOPOULOS DENTAL CORP. dba VILLAGE FAMILY DENTAL OFFICE, individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated and M. Papadopoulos Dental Corp. |
MEDICAL SYNERGY, INC. |
2:2019cv06515 |
July 26, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dale S Fischer |
Steve Kim |
Other Statutory Actions |
47 U.S.C. ยง 0227 Violation of Telephone Consumer Protection Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff M. Papadopoulos Dental Corp.. Dismissal is without prejudice. (Martin, George) |
Filing 14 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 12/28/2019. (rfi) |
Filing 13 DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Defendant Medical Synergy, Inc. (jp) |
Filing 12 APPLICATION for Clerk to Enter Default Medical Synergy, Inc. M. Papadopoulos Dental Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Martin, George) |
Filing 11 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 10/23/2019. (rfi) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff M. Papadopoulos Dental Corp., upon Defendant Medical Synergy, Inc. served on 9/13/2019, answer due 10/4/2019. in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Martin, George) |
Filing 9 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (pg) |
Filing 8 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge Dale S. Fischer for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:19-cv-06515 DSF(SKx). (rn) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Medical Synergy, Inc. (et) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (et) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties (Martin, George) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff M. PAPADOPOULOS DENTAL CORP. dba VILLAGE FAMILY DENTAL OFFICE, individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated. (Martin, George) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 M. PAPADOPOULOS DENTAL CORP. dba VILLAGE FAMILY DENTAL OFFICE, individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated. (Martin, George) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24156969 - Fee: $400. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Attorney George Thomas Martin, III added to party M. PAPADOPOULOS DENTAL CORP. dba VILLAGE FAMILY DENTAL OFFICE, individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated(pty:pla))(Martin, George) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.