Roberto Corona-Bautista v. David Marin
Petitioner: Roberto Corona-Bautista
Respondent: David Marin
Case Number: 2:2019cv06527
Filed: July 28, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Shashi H Kewalramani
Referring Judge: Stephen V Wilson
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 14, 2019 Filing 7 PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN (USM-285) of summons and Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #1 (Bakeman, Willard)
July 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION #5 by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. Petitioner's motion for reconsideration, Dkt. 5, is DENIED. Along with other potential evidentiary deficiencies, Petitioners Exhibit "A" is not attached to the motion. (mrgo)
July 29, 2019 Filing 5 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Reconsideration re Order on Motion to Stay Order (other), #4 filed by petitioner Roberto Corona-Bautista. Ex Parte Application set for hearing on 8/6/2019 at 10:00 AM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (Bakeman, Willard)
July 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR EMERGENCY STAY #2 by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. Petitioner's motion for emergency stay consists of a half-page "Statement of the Case." Based upon the lack of any supporting documents, the Court is unable to provide relief at this time. The conclusory Statement of the Case is insufficient. Petitioner's motion, Dkt. 2, is DENIED. (mrgo)
July 29, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (esa)
July 28, 2019 Filing 2 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Stay pending petition for habeas corpus filed by petitioner Roberto Corona-Bautista. Ex Parte Application set for hearing on 8/6/2019 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (Bakeman, Willard)
July 28, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody (28 USC 2241), Receipt No. 0973-24159206 for $5 filing fee, filed by petitioner Roberto Corona-Bautista. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Willard Patrick Bakeman, III added to party Roberto Corona-Bautista(pty:bkmov))(Bakeman, Willard)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roberto Corona-Bautista v. David Marin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: David Marin
Represented By: OIL-DCS Trial Attorney
Represented By: Assistant 2241-194 US Attorney LA-CV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Roberto Corona-Bautista
Represented By: Willard Patrick Bakeman, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?