Virco Mfg. Corporation v. Target Corporation
Virco Mfg. Corporation |
TARGET CORPORATION |
2:2019cv06552 |
July 29, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Ronald SW Lew |
Michael R Wilner |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT #13 by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. The Court has considered the parties Third Stipulation To Extend Time To Respond to Complaint, and good cause appearing therefor, it is hereby ORDERED the Defendant has until and including October 3, 2019 to respond to the Complaint in this matter. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS. (yl) |
Filing 13 Third STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 10/3/2019 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Target Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Bjorgum, A) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Defendant Target Corporation. (Bjorgum, A) |
Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less), #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (shb) |
Filing 10 Second STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Target Corporation answer now due 9/19/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less), #9 filed by Defendant Target Corporation.(Bjorgum, A) |
Filing 9 First STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Target Corporation answer now due 9/5/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Target Corporation.(Attorney A Eric Bjorgum added to party Target Corporation(pty:dft))(Bjorgum, A) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Target Corporation. (jtil) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S. W. Lew and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (jtil) |
Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Virco Mfg. Corporation. (Friedland, Michael) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Virco Mfg. Corporation, identifying Virco Mfg. Corporation. (Friedland, Michael) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Virco Mfg. Corporation. (Friedland, Michael) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Virco Mfg. Corporation. (Friedland, Michael) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24164598 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Virco Mfg. Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-D) (Attorney Michael K Friedland added to party Virco Mfg. Corporation(pty:pla))(Friedland, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.