Chris A. Williams v. Hy-Vee, Inc. et al
| Chris A. Williams |
| DOES 1-10 Inclusive and Hy-Vee, Inc. |
| 2:2019cv06671 |
| August 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alka Sagar |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Hy-Vee, Inc. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (jtil) |
| Filing 5 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Chris A. Williams. (Erikson, David) |
| Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Chris A. Williams. (Erikson, David) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Chris A. Williams, (Erikson, David) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Chris A. Williams. (Erikson, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24184987 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Chris A. Williams. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney David A Erikson added to party Chris A. Williams(pty:pla))(Erikson, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
