United States of America v. 28,730.00 USD In Currency
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: 28,730.00 USD In Currency
Case Number: 2:2019cv06677
Filed: August 1, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Gail J Standish
Nature of Suit: Drug Related Seizure of Property
Cause of Action: 21 U.S.C. ยง 881
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 10, 2019 Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to 28,730.00 USD In Currency answer now due 10/31/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff United States of America.(Whittlesey, Brent)
September 5, 2019 Filing 10 SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT Executed by Plaintiff United States of America, by Publication upon Defendant All Defendants. Publication was made in the www.forfeiture.gov for 30 consecutive days. (Whittlesey, Brent)
August 15, 2019 Filing 9 PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN (USM-285) of summons and Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 upon 28,730.00 USD In Currency served on 8/8/2019, answer due 8/29/2019, Remarks: Seized $28,730.09 (19-DEA-649912) AS 2:19-cv-06677 on 08/08/2019. (sbou)
August 5, 2019 Filing 8 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by PLAINTIFF United States of America. (Whittlesey, Brent)
August 1, 2019 Filing 7 WARRANT for seizure of 28,730.00 USD In Currency issued on Complaint #1 . (esa)
August 1, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (esa)
August 1, 2019 Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Warrant for Seizure on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by PLAINTIFF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,. (Whittlesey, Brent)
August 1, 2019 Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OF MAGISTRATE CONFLICT filed by Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, re: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 (Whittlesey, Brent)
August 1, 2019 Filing 3 MEMORANDUM filed by Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, for the purpose of determining whether the above-referenced civil matter, being filed on AUGUST 1, 2019, was not pending in the US Attorneys Office before the date on which Judges Andre Birotte, Jr. and Michael W. Fitzgerald began receiving civil matters. (Whittlesey, Brent)
August 1, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,. (Whittlesey, Brent)
August 1, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT No Fee Required - US Government, filed by PLAINTIFF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,. (Attorney Brent A Whittlesey added to party UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,(pty:pla))(Whittlesey, Brent)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. 28,730.00 USD In Currency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 28,730.00 USD In Currency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Brent A Whittlesey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?