Casa Herrera, Inc. v. Barcel S.A. de C.V. et al
| Casa Herrera, Inc. |
| Barcel S.A. de C.V. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2019cv06885 |
| August 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Steve Kim |
| Christina A Snyder |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE Notice of Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Casa Herrera, Inc.. (Staroba, Samantha) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Barcel S.A. de C.V. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (car) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Casa Herrera, Inc.. (Haskin, Richard) |
| Filing 3 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Casa Herrera, Inc., identifying Barcel S.A. De C.V.. (Haskin, Richard) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Casa Herrera, Inc.. (Haskin, Richard) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24226630 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Casa Herrera, Inc.. (Attorney Richard E Haskin added to party Casa Herrera, Inc.(pty:pla))(Haskin, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
