Jane Doe 1 v. Manhattan Beach Unified School District et al
| Jane Doe and Jane Doe 1 |
| Tyler Gordon, Ben Dale, Manhattan Beach Unified School District and DOES 2-10, inclusive |
| 2:2019cv06962 |
| August 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Dean D Pregerson |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 38
TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: On the Court's own motion, the Motions' to Dismiss Case [27,28 ] set for hearing December 2, 2019, are hereby continued to January 13, 2020 at 10:00 AM. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pg) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 37
REPLY In Support Of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss DISMISS PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT #27 filed by Defendant Manhattan Beach Unified School District. (Evenstad, Amy)
|
|
Filing 36
REPLY In Support Of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case CLAIMS IN PLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(B)(6) #28 filed by Defendant Manhattan Beach Unified School District. (Evenstad, Amy)
|
|
Filing 35
MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case CLAIMS IN PLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(B)(6) #28 (MBUSD) filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe 1. (Kelly, Michael)
|
|
Filing 34
MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss DISMISS PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT #27 (Ben Dale) filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe 1. (Kelly, Michael)
|
|
Filing 33
Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ben Dale, Manhattan Beach Unified School District, identifying MANHATTAN BEACH UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT AND BEN DALE. (Evenstad, Amy)
|
|
Filing 32
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 3-4-2020. (shb)
|
|
Filing 31
SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: Pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16(b), the Court issues the following Order: Counsel must agree on the date for the disclosure of expert witness reports pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(a)2. Discovery cut-off 10/12/2020. Motions due by 11/2/2020. Final Pretrial Conference set for 2/1/2021 AT 11:00 a.m. Jury Trial set for 2/9/2021 at 09:00 a.m. (shb)
|
|
Filing 30
MINUTES OF SCHEDULING CONFERENCE held before Judge Dean D. Pregerson. Held scheduling conference. Court and counsel confer re case status. Court sets trial dates. (Refer to the SCHEDULING ORDER to be issued hereafter.) Court Reporter: None Present. (shb)
|
|
Filing 29
NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case CLAIMS IN PLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(B)(6) #28 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss DISMISS PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT #27 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (shb)
|
|
Filing 28
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case CLAIMS IN PLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(B)(6) filed by Defendant Manhattan Beach Unified School District. Motion set for hearing on 12/2/2019 at 10:00 AM before Judge Dean D. Pregerson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Evenstad, Amy)
|
|
Filing 27
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss DISMISS PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by defendant Ben Dale. Motion set for hearing on 12/2/2019 at 10:00 AM before Judge Dean D. Pregerson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Attorney Amy Arseneaux Evenstad added to party Ben Dale(pty:dft)) (Evenstad, Amy)
|
|
Filing 26
ORDER GRANTING THE PARTIES JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE TO NOVEMBER 4, 2019, #25 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. The Court ORDERS that the Scheduling Conference in this matter, currently set for October 28, 2019, be continued to November 4, 2019, at 1:30 p.m. in Department 9C of the above-entitled Court. (shb)
|
|
Filing 25
STIPULATION to Continue The Scheduling Conference from October 28, 2019 to November 4, 2019 Re: Order, Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings #21 filed by Defendant Manhattan Beach Unified School District. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Evenstad, Amy)
|
|
Filing 24
JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 10 days, filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe 1.. (Kelly, Michael)
|
|
Filing 23
Answer to First Amended Complaint filed by Defendant Tyler Gordon (Hahn, Adrienne)
|
|
Filing 22
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by PLAINTIFF Jane Doe 1(Kelly, Michael)
|
|
Filing 21
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. Scheduling Conference set for 10/28/2019 at 1:30 p.m. (See order for further details) (yl)
|
|
Filing 20
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Dean D. Pregerson. Counsel are encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. The address is http://www.cacd.uscourts.gov. It is not necessary to clear a motion date with the Court Clerk prior to filing the motion. The Court hears motions only on Mondays at 10:00 a.m. (See minutes for further details) (yl)
|
|
Filing 19
ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Tyler Gordon.(Attorney Adrienne R Hahn added to party Tyler Gordon(pty:dft))(Hahn, Adrienne)
|
|
Filing 18
PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jane Doe 1, upon Defendant Tyler Gordon served on 8/27/2019, answer due 9/17/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Christopher S. Gordon, Father in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Kelly, Michael)
|
|
Filing 17
PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jane Doe 1, upon Defendant Manhattan Beach Unified School District served on 8/19/2019, answer due 9/9/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Heather Hoffman, agent for service of process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Kelly, Michael)
|
|
Filing 16
STIPULATION to Continue Extend time to respond to initial complaint from 9/9/19 to 10/9/19 Re: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Manhattan Beach Unified School District.(Attorney Amy Arseneaux Evenstad added to party Manhattan Beach Unified School District(pty:dft))(Evenstad, Amy)
|
|
Filing 15
21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Ben Dale. (shb)
|
|
Filing 14
21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Tyler Gordon. (shb)
|
|
Filing 13
Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Jane Doe 1. (Kelly, Michael)
|
|
Filing 12
Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Jane Doe 1. (Kelly, Michael)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge Dean D. Pregerson for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:19-cv-06962 DDP(RAOx). (rn)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Joshua Adam Fields on behalf of Plaintiff Jane Doe 1 (Attorney Joshua Adam Fields added to party Jane Doe 1(pty:pla))(Fields, Joshua)
|
|
Filing 9
21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendant Manhattan Beach Unified School District. (lom)
|
|
Filing 8
Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Jane Doe 1. (Kelly, Michael)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons. The following error(s) was found: Summons is not directed to the defendant(s). The defendants name must appear in the To:section of the summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (jtil)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (jtil)
|
|
Filing 4
Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe. (Kelly, Michael)
|
|
Filing 3
CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe, (Kelly, Michael)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe. (Kelly, Michael)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24240122 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe. (Attorney Michael L Kelly added to party Jane Doe(pty:pla))(Kelly, Michael)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
