David Greenstein v. The Coca-Cola Company
| David Greenstein |
| The Coca-Cola Company |
| 2:2019cv06989 |
| August 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Karen L Stevenson |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 19-03 (Related Case) filed. Transfer of case declined by Judge Stephen V. Wilson, for the reasons set forth on this order. Related Case No. 2:19-cv-06985 SVW(ASx) (rn)
|
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by defendant The Coca-Cola Company, re Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less), #10 served on 10/2/2019. (McGuirk, Justin) |
| Filing 10 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to The Coca-Cola Company answer now due 10/21/2019, re Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less), #7 filed by defendant The Coca-Cola Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(McGuirk, Justin) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by defendant The Coca-Cola Company, re Notice of Related Case(s) #8 served on 09/27/2019. (McGuirk, Justin) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by defendant The Coca-Cola Company. Related Case(s): 2:19-cv-06985-SVW-AS (McGuirk, Justin) |
| Filing 7 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to The Coca-Cola Company answer now due 10/7/2019, re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 filed by Defendant The Coca-Cola Company.(Attorney Justin Edward McGuirk added to party The Coca-Cola Company(pty:dft))(McGuirk, Justin) |
|
Filing 6
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (lh) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff David Greenstein. (lh) |
| Filing 2 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant The Coca-Cola Company. (lh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendant The Coca-Cola Company. Case assigned to Judge Andre Birotte Jr for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (Filing Fee $ 400 Paid) Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff David Greenstein. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: David Greenstein v. The Coca-Cola Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Coca-Cola Company | |
| Represented By: | Justin Edward McGuirk |
| Represented By: | Robert N Phillips |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: David Greenstein | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
