David Greenstein v. Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc. et al
| David Greenstein |
| DOES 1 through Five and Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc. |
| 2:2019cv06991 |
| August 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Gail J Standish |
| John F Walter |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
SELF-REPRESENTATION ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. (iv)
|
|
Filing 6
STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv)
|
| Filing 5 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (jtil) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff David Greenstein. (jtil) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff David Greenstein against Defendant Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc. Case assigned to Judge John F. Walter for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (Filing fee $ 400 Paid). (Attachments: #1 CV-71) (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
