Linus Ekene v. L. Fowler et al
Plaintiff: Linus Ekene
Defendant: J. Galapon and L. Fowler
Case Number: 2:2019cv06995
Filed: August 12, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John D Early
Referring Judge: Dean D Pregerson
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 6, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE OF SUBMISSION OF DOCUMENTS TO U.S. MARSHAL filed by Plaintiff Linus Ekene. (hr)
August 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER by Magistrate Judge John D. Early: granting #2 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1915, the prisoner-plaintiff owes the Court the total filing fee of $350.00. An initial partial filing fee of $0.00 must be paid within thirty (30) days of the date this order is filed. Failure to remit the initial partial filing fee may result in dismissal of the case. Thereafter, monthly payments shall be forwarded to the Court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). (hr)
August 20, 2019 Filing 7 TEXT ONLY ENTRY SERVICE PACKAGE SENT VIA REGULAR POSTAL MAIL TO ADDRESS LISTED AS: Linus Ekene CDC F-84633 Mule Creek State Prison P.O. Box 409020 Ione, CA 95640. Package includes Original Embossed Summons Issued #6 , ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE OF PROCESS BY THE UNITED STATES MARSHAL, including instructions for service #4 , ORDER RE: SERVICE OF COMPLAINT #5 , and USM-285 forms. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mba) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
August 20, 2019 Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights) #1 as to Defendant L. Fowler, J. Galapon. (mba)
August 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER Re: Service of Process by Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (mba)
August 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER Directing Service by the United States Marshal by Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (mba)
August 12, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and referred to Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (car)
August 12, 2019 Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Linus Ekene. (car)
August 12, 2019 Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants L. Fowler, J. Galapon pursuant to 42 USC 1983. Case assigned to Judge Dean D. Pregerson and referred to Magistrate Judge John D. Early, filed by plaintiff Linus Ekene. (car)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Linus Ekene v. L. Fowler et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Galapon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: L. Fowler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Linus Ekene
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?