Chris Langer v. Ram Rasa, Inc. et al
| Chris Langer |
| Does 1-10 and Ram Rasa, Inc. |
| Roes 1 through 50 and Park & Save, Inc. |
| 2:2019cv07022 |
| August 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S Gutierrez |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Scheduling Conference set for 12/16/2019 at 02:00 PM. (wm)
|
| Filing 16 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Robert W Struck counsel for Cross Claimant Ram Rasa, Inc., Defendant Ram Rasa, Inc.. Filed by Defendant/Cross-Complainant RAM RASA, INC.. (Attorney Robert W Struck added to party Ram Rasa, Inc.(pty:crc), Attorney Robert W Struck added to party Ram Rasa, Inc.(pty:dft))(Struck, Robert) |
| Filing 15 21 DAY Summons Issued re Crossclaim #12 as to Cross Defendant Park and Save, Inc. (bm) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ram Rasa, Inc.(a California Corporation), (Hauser, John) |
| Filing 13 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Crossclaim #12 filed by Cross-Complainant Ram Rasa, Inc.(a California Corporation). (Hauser, John) |
| Filing 12 CROSSCLAIM against Park & Save, Inc.; No, filed by Cross-Complainant Ram Rasa, Inc..(Hauser, John) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , CROSSCLAIM against Ram Rasa, Inc. filed by Defendant Ram Rasa, Inc..(Attorney John Ayre Hauser added to party Ram Rasa, Inc.(pty:dft))(Hauser, John) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Chris Langerto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings,, #9 (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Proof of Service)(Handy, Russell) |
|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS re Order to Show Cause re: Supplemental Jurisdiction by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: The complaint filed in this action asserts a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") and a claim for damages pursuant to California's Unruh Civil Rights Act. The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause in writing no later than September 6, 2019 why it should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim. (see document for further details) (bm)
|
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ji)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Ram Rasa, Inc. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (et) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Chris Langer. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Chris Langer, (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Chris Langer. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24250062 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Chris Langer. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Chris Langer(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
