Stuart Lachman v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. et al
| Stuart Lachman |
| AT and T Pension Benefit Plan and Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. |
| 2:2019cv07120 |
| August 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F Eick |
| George H Wu |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants AT and T Pension Benefit Plan, Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Stuart Lachman, (Kantor, Andrew) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Stuart Lachman. (Kantor, Andrew) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Stuart Lachman. (Kantor, Andrew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24269131 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Stuart Lachman. (Attorney Andrew Michael Kantor added to party Stuart Lachman(pty:pla))(Kantor, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
