Shannon Lott v. Andrew Saul
| Shannon Lott |
| Andrew Saul |
| 2:2019cv07148 |
| August 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S Gutierrez |
| Alicia G Rosenberg |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Andrew Saul. (Attorney Francesco P Benavides added to party Andrew Saul(pty:dft))(Benavides, Francesco) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Shannon Lott, upon Defendant Andrew Saul served on 9/17/2019, answer due 11/18/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by unspecified means. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by unspecified means. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by unspecified means. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certified Mail Proof)(Drake, Erika) |
Filing 9
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER [Social Security] by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (See Order for Further Details) (kl)
|
| Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Andrew Saul. (hr) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg: granting #2 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (hr)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and referred to Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (esa) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Shannon Lott. (Drake, Erika) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Shannon Lott, (Drake, Erika) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Shannon Lott. (Drake, Erika) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Shannon Lott. (Drake, Erika) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by plaintiff Shannon Lott. (Attorney Erika Bailey Drake added to party Shannon Lott(pty:pla))(Drake, Erika) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Shannon Lott v. Andrew Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
| Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA |
| Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-CV |
| Represented By: | Francesco P Benavides |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Shannon Lott | |
| Represented By: | Erika Bailey Drake |
| Represented By: | Roger David Drake |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
