Roger Huffman v. Ford Motor Company
| Roger Huffman |
| Ford Motor Company |
| 2:2019cv07175 |
| August 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Andre Birotte |
| Frederick F Mumm |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR OMNIBUS REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE REGARDING CERTAIN CLR PLAINTIFFS IDENTIFIED HEREIN by Judge Andre Birotte, Jr.: Pursuant to the parties Stipulation, Master MDL Case No. 2:18-ml-02814 AB (FFMx), Dkt. No. 823, the cases identified in this order, including all claims stated herein against all parties, are hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys fees and costs. See document for further details. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) Associated Cases: 2:18-cv-07781-AB-FFM et al. (gk)
|
| Filing 4 ORIGINAL file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received from California Eastern |
| Filing 7 Letter to Counsel regarding MDL Transfer-In. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (car) |
| Filing 5 Copy of Conditional Transfer Order - CTO-30 received from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. Transfer order filed by MDL panel on 8/15/2019 regarding transfer of Case No. 2:18-cv-01632-JAM-KJN from Eastern District of California - Live System (Sacramento). Case assigned to Judge Andre Birotte Jr for the purpose of pretrial proceedings. Case consolidated with 2:18-ml-02814-AB-FFMx. (car) |
| Filing 3 MDL ORDER. CASE TRANSFERRED to District of Central District of California. CASE CLOSED. Electronic Record Sent. (Donati, J) [Transferred from California Eastern on 8/21/2019.] |
| Filing 2 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 Order re Filing Requirements, #3 VDRP) (Becknal, R) [Transferred from California Eastern on 8/21/2019.] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Sacramento Superior Court, case number 34-2018-00232682 by All Plaintiffs. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-7699596) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Certificate of Interested Entities, #4 Certificate of Service, #5 Declaration of Counsel, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lambert, Kristina) [Transferred from California Eastern on 8/21/2019.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Roger Huffman v. Ford Motor Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Roger Huffman | |
| Represented By: | Allen-Michel D Resnick |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ford Motor Company | |
| Represented By: | Kristina Obradovic Lambert |
| Represented By: | Harry Paul Efstratis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
