Gregory Powers v. Fingerhut

Plaintiff: Gregory Powers
Defendant: Fingerhut d/b/a Bluestem Brands, Inc., Fingerhut and Fingerhut doing business as Bluestem Brands, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2019cv07255
Filed: August 21, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Cormac J Carney
Referring Judge: Alka Sagar
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 25, 2019 Filing 9 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Fingerhut answer now due 10/28/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Fingerhut.(Attorney Michael Jaeger added to party Fingerhut(pty:dft))(Jaeger, Michael)
September 10, 2019 Filing 8 SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Gregory Powers, upon Defendant Fingerhut served on 9/9/2019, answer due 9/30/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Bennecoff Ginsburg, Amy)
August 22, 2019 Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Fingerhut. (et)
August 22, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
August 22, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (et)
August 21, 2019 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Gregory Powers, (Bennecoff Ginsburg, Amy)
August 21, 2019 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Gregory Powers. (Bennecoff Ginsburg, Amy)
August 21, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Gregory Powers. (Bennecoff Ginsburg, Amy)
August 21, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24299782 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Gregory Powers. (Attorney Amy Lynn Bennecoff Ginsburg added to party Gregory Powers(pty:pla))(Bennecoff Ginsburg, Amy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gregory Powers v. Fingerhut
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gregory Powers
Represented By: Amy Lynn Bennecoff Ginsburg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fingerhut d/b/a Bluestem Brands, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fingerhut
Represented By: Michael Jaeger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fingerhut doing business as Bluestem Brands, Inc.
Represented By: Michael Jaeger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?